Axil, Yes, clearly dense hydrogen is necessary, and their IP does not limit the power going in to lasers. They have made a great effort to avoid reference to Mills version of dense hydrogen, but there is little doubt that patents will be contested if there is a commercial success.
The company Norront Fusion Systems is very well funded and is using laser irradiation but does not want to broadcast that fact due to the IP which is already out there, mostly held by National labs in the US. BTW this company Norront - in Norway, says that they have 3 operating reactors producing muons, now! For all we know they could be months away from a big announcement. http://www.norrontfusion.com/ Holmlid seems to be fond of exaggeration at times and has said several things he would probably like to take back or clarify, such as the muon effect happening with fluorescent lighting and other nonsense. This is one of the reasons that some physicists refuse to even consider the validity of his experiments. They will get a big surprise soon IMO. Now that Holmlid has gone full tilt commercial and has big money involved - almost nothing said can be believed, except details in the patent which if false would jeopardize the legal protection. Axil Axil wrote: Jones, You may be placing too much emphasis on the laser reaction mechanism with Ultra dense hydrogen here. Holmlid has found that the laser pulse can be replaced with a spark and that spark can still get the same reactions to occur as that low powered laser pulse can. The indispensable role that Ultra dense hydrogen plays in this quark confinement disruption reaction is to reformat the stimulant EMF energy into the proper strong force disruption format.
