"baryon number conservation"   does not apply in proton decay which in
simple terms is what Holmlid  is producing through the action of ultra
dense hydrogen. Generally, in one of the major activities in LENR, there
is  charge-parity non-conservation ("CP violation")
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation> occurring. LENR is also a
process in which  baryogenesis <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryogenesis> is
occurring. One of the central mechanisms that underpins the LENR reaction
is chiral particle polarization. This mechanism is what produces CP
violations as well as radioactive isotope stabilization through the
amplification of the weak force.

Ultra dense hydrogen produces two chiral spin polarized vortex flux tubes,
a right handed vortex tube(south) and a left handed vortex tube(north).
Within these tubes is where matter disintegration and reformation
(transmutation) occurs. These details in the way that the transmutation
mechanism works can be seen in the LION reactor meltdown ash analysis.

It was bound to happen sooner or later, Holmlid has run up against the LENR
stigma.

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:32 AM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> Posted on LENR-forum by Can
>
> PLOS ONE editors retract one of Holmlid's papers.
>
> https://journals.plos.org/plos…69895#pone.0212979.ref001
> <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169895#pone.0212979.ref001>
>
> https://journals.plos.org/plos…1371/journal.pone.0212979
>
> Apparently the problem is "baryon number conservation"  and the absence
> of sufficiently strong evidence to support the claims made...
>
> Looks like the editors caved to mainstream objections.
>
> Plus (or Plos) there are billions of dollars in funding at stake here...
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to