Thinking about it as an engineer might, it could be that an individual proton is subjected to locally enormous stress which causes it to fail (disintegrate).
Harry On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, 2:19 PM JonesBeene <[email protected] wrote: > One of the big knocks about the Holmlid effect – where the claim is that > hydrogen > > is completely annihilated- showing up primarily as muons, which then decay > (but > > can catalyze fusion before decay) is the low input energy used by Holmlid. > > > > This annihilation process is well known in beamlines at the big labs and > normally > > requires a massive amount of energy to smash protons into “quark soup”… > > > > Because of the disparity in applied energy – many experts think Holmlid is > delusional. > > > > But wait…the problem here could be that the critics’ only tool is the > beamline and > > the geniuses have not carefully looked elsewhere. In fact, there could be > another > > way to approach annihilation – the antineutron. But where would they > coming from? > > > > Hidden in plain sight… as it were. > > > > The following research confirms the theory that the antiproton is the > exact mirror > > image of the proton. There is absolutely no difference other than the > charge has been > > flipped. This is important for an alterative understanding of annihilation. > > > > “Protons and antiprotons appear to be true mirror images” > > https://phys.org/news/2015-08-protons-antiprotons-true-mirror-images.html > > Thus the question is this: can coherent photons of the correct energy and > resonance flip > > a proton into an antiproton by simply reversing the charge? Clearly the > answer implies > > a backdoor to proton annihilation if Holmlid is correct. > > > > Charge conjugation is a transformation that switches particles with their > corresponding > > antiparticles, and it is well studied as C-symmetry. Sooner or later if > the Holmlid effect > > continues to be validated as Norront has done, the experts will realize > that proton > > annihilation is simply the surprising result of charge-flipping following > laser irradiation … > > > > AT LOW ENERGY …and massive input from a proton beam is not required. > > > > The critics may end looking like fools unless they jump onboard the > Holmlid express, > > which is leaving the station soon. Next stop – Stockholm. > > > > > > > > >
