I hear that a spark does just as well as a laser pulse. On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:19 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote:
> One of the big knocks about the Holmlid effect – where the claim is that > hydrogen > > is completely annihilated- showing up primarily as muons, which then decay > (but > > can catalyze fusion before decay) is the low input energy used by Holmlid. > > > > This annihilation process is well known in beamlines at the big labs and > normally > > requires a massive amount of energy to smash protons into “quark soup”… > > > > Because of the disparity in applied energy – many experts think Holmlid is > delusional. > > > > But wait…the problem here could be that the critics’ only tool is the > beamline and > > the geniuses have not carefully looked elsewhere. In fact, there could be > another > > way to approach annihilation – the antineutron. But where would they > coming from? > > > > Hidden in plain sight… as it were. > > > > The following research confirms the theory that the antiproton is the > exact mirror > > image of the proton. There is absolutely no difference other than the > charge has been > > flipped. This is important for an alterative understanding of annihilation. > > > > “Protons and antiprotons appear to be true mirror images” > > https://phys.org/news/2015-08-protons-antiprotons-true-mirror-images.html > > Thus the question is this: can coherent photons of the correct energy and > resonance flip > > a proton into an antiproton by simply reversing the charge? Clearly the > answer implies > > a backdoor to proton annihilation if Holmlid is correct. > > > > Charge conjugation is a transformation that switches particles with their > corresponding > > antiparticles, and it is well studied as C-symmetry. Sooner or later if > the Holmlid effect > > continues to be validated as Norront has done, the experts will realize > that proton > > annihilation is simply the surprising result of charge-flipping following > laser irradiation … > > > > AT LOW ENERGY …and massive input from a proton beam is not required. > > > > The critics may end looking like fools unless they jump onboard the > Holmlid express, > > which is leaving the station soon. Next stop – Stockholm. > > > > > > > > >
