Bin Laden did not attack the United States. The WTC towers were brought down by explosives, not by burning fuel, carpets and furniture, which were not nearly hot enough to soften the steel. Bin Laden had no way to plant explosives.
Please download the three parts of this video and watch them: Loose Change Second Edition (not the first edition) http://www.question911.com/links.php Israeli spies were caught filming and celebrating the collapse of the towers, which had been bought only a few months before by a man with very close ties to the Israeli government, and who insisted on an insurance policy that would pay him double in case of terrorism. http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911 9-11 was a false-flag operation -- a terrorist attack done by one group (U.S. and Israel) but designed to appear as having been done by another (those Arabs). Both the U.S. and Israel have carried out many false-flag attacks in the past. The "Neo-Conservatives" that control the Republican party, and the closely related Democratic Leadership Council that controls the Democratic party, have very close ties with the Israeli government. Some of them have co-authored papers recommending that Israel destabilize the other nations of the Middle East. Some have dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel. All have enthusiastically supported Israel's 58 year long robbery, torture, and murder of the Palestinians. A passenger 757 did not hit the Pentagon. None of the 200 passenger chairs of such a plane -- designed to withstand 5000 pounds of force and covered with fire-resistant upholstery -- were found in the building. The fire could not have melted them. There was also insufficient debris to account for any large airplane. http://pentagonresearch.com/ This excellent website has 9-11 research by various university professors: http://scholarsfor911truth.org/ Mark On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:54:36PM -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: >Rick Monteverde writes: > >>Jed - don't you think that granting foreign interests a stake in what we >>have here might actually mitigate foreign attitudes towards terror >>attacks against the US? > >I doubt we can accomplish that. 95% of the men in Saudi Arabia >consider Bin Laden a national hero because he attacked us, and >I expect a similar proportion support him in the UAE. These >people hate our guts as violently as we hated the Nazis, >because they feel that we supported tyrannical governments >for the past 50 years. (Which is true -- we did.) This kind >of deep-rooted hate is not going to be "mitigated" any time >soon. It will take generations. The first step must be to >end our use of oil. We must stop sending billions of dollars >to tyrants and terrorists. This river of money has corrupted >and destroyed their culture. > >Foreign interests . . . would be fine. A private corporation >based in another country with a clean reputation would >be fine. But this corporation is owned by the government >of the United Arab Emirates. The UAE is one of only three >countries that recognized the Taliban government, and it has >deep links to terrorism. It was "an important transshipment >point for the smuggling network of Abdul Qadeer Khan, the >Pakistani scientist who supplied Libya, Iran and North Korea >with equipment for making nuclear weapons." (N. Y. Times) >To hand over control of our ports to them, in a time of war, >would be like putting a Japanese MITI-chartered construction >firm in charge of repairing the Yorktown before the battle >of Midway. To my mind, this has nothing to do with racism. I >do not want to see employees of the UAE government in charge >of one of the most critical and -- at present -- porous and >badly managed security risks in the US. > >- Jed >
