Andrew and Jones— IMHO the main stream physics autocratic institution deserves the scorn that would come from publication of the table Jones is suggesting.
P. Hatt and W. Stubbs should be added to your list of alternate designers for nuclear physical modeling Bob Cook ________________________________ From: Andrew Meulenberg <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 8:38:16 PM To: VORTEX Subject: Re: [Vo]:This could be an indication of "dense hydrogen" from solarorigin Of course Dirac, Klein, and Gordon should head the list, since their relativistic QM equations started much of this over 80 years ago. While they were not snubbed, the deep-orbit electron level was certainly rejected by the mainstream. You should add Jean-Luc Paillet to the list since he is confirming and improving the deep Dirac levels that Va'vra and Maly presented (along with those of Klein and Gordon) to the CMNS community in 1993 - 1995. Jon Naudts, in 2005, proposed the deep-electron orbit for CF based on the Klein-Gordon (relativistic Schrodinger) equation for spinless particles. Including spin (via the Dirac equations) only changed the binding energy of these orbits by ~ 2 keV. Every decade since 1959 has someone publishing on the deep-electron orbits of the Dirac and/or Klein-Gordon equations. Just as regularly, the mainstream pushed the idea down to preserve the status quo. Schwinger was also "scorned" when he proposed that nuclear energy could be shared with bound electrons since this could lead to deeper orbits and fusion. _ _ _ On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:11 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: How low can you go? Picometers are so passe’… The $64 question… what is the densest of the dense? Has anyone ever put together a table which lists the various theories of dense hydrogen and also lists the diameter of the densest species supported by the theory? This could be an opportune time to start such a table. Here are some names that come to find who have written specifically on dense hydrogen with size estimates. Please provide corrections and additions. It is fully realized that a few of these researchers have provided far more effort and insight than others, not to mention many more publications. But this is not a contest, yet it is intriguing to me that most of this is high quality work – yet still snubbed by the mainstream. Randell Mills A.O Barut Leif Holmlid Nabil Lawandy Jerry Vavra Yoshiaki Arata Friedwardt Winterberg Cerofolini Andrew Meulenberg F.J. Mayer George Miley Jacque Dufour Horace Heffner Robin van Spaandonk Jürg Wyttenbach And others to be added/// The next column would be the smallest version of proton bound to an electron in picometers/femtometers. Other relevant columns should be added.
