Possible ways for (*e-) to end up in copper, aluminum, or steel. If it exists.
Copper Processing: http://www.p2pays.org/ref/01/text/00778/chapter5.htm Aluminum Smelting and Refining: http://www.p2pays.org/ref/01/text/00778/chapter4.htm Steel Making: http://www.p2pays.org/ref/01/text/00778/chapter2.htm > > Jones wrote, > > > > > > --- Fred the Anonymous <g> writes, > > > > > putting a few pounds of copper, aluminum, or steel, > > wire sized to get an > > > optimum electron drift speed to entrain the (*e-) > > particles, in series with any > > > of the OU electrolysis experiments will boost the OU > > yield. > > > > > > How does one "size" the different kinds of wire to get > > the optimum drift speed? > > > Easy, after I looked it up. :-) > Current density J = amperes/area. For a 0.001 meter diameter copper wire > carrying 20 amps > J = 20/0.25 (Pi)(0.001)^2 = 2.54e^7 amperes/meter^2 > At N = 8.5e^28 free electrons/meter^3 for copper: > Then v = J/N*q = 2.54e^7/8.5e^28 * 1.6e^-19 = 1.87e^-3 meters/sec or 1.87 > mm/sec. > > But you don't want to spend your OU money on I^2R heat loss. > > > > And... if there is some fundamental difference in > > either the free electron, or the (*e-) triad, compared > > to when either is bound in the valence electron cloud, > > then how does one get the free variety "into" a > > conductor efficiently ? ... VDG belt ? > > > Nope, just assume that Nature put it there. Even a neutral gas impinging > on a metal surface can exchange electrons with it. > > Diffusion, chemical processes, radioactivity etc., over billions > of years... > > Fred the Anonymous > > >
