Ron— One additional idea about the microwave weight reduction test:
Since the loss of weight continues after the microwave is turned off, it would make sense to remove the magnet/aluminum plate from the machine to a nearby scale, shielded from the microwave, and see if the weight changes like happened in the machine after turning it off. If the effect of weight reduction results from the loss of a consistent (homogeneous) nuclear magnetic dipole orientation) may be expected given the mass of the combined magnetic nuclear magnetic dipole field created by the assembly of the earth’s magnetic dipoles. I consider even random oriented magnetic dipoles produce a weak magnetic field that is similar in magnitude with a gravitational attraction at a distance above about 60 meters between the centers of two separate masses of magnetic dipoles. This consideration is based on analyses accomplished by several Romanian physicists over the last couple decades. http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/html/10.11648.j.ajmp.20150403.11.html A similar analysis would apply to magnetic dipole fields at a distance as addressed for electric fields in the item identified above IMHO, if electric and magnetic fields fall off at about 1/rxr with distance from their source. Sections 7 and 8 of the linked item above address this issue. (I remember another paper from Romania that looks specifically at the magnetic dipole and quadrupole analysis for nuclear parameters and potential explanation of gravitational forces as EM forces. (I lost reference to that paper in the cloud MS storage I think…maybe someone knows this lost paper and can identify a current source. ) Bob Cook From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 10:49 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity Paper 81-1608 Ron—I could not understand the setup well enough to address the questions the apparent results raise. – * Was the Al plate between the permanent magnets rotated inside the microwave machine? * What did the entire assembly with the microwave machine before and after the experiment weigh? * Did the action of the microwave machine influence the scale electronics, causing it to change its output? * Was there a control run to check on the effect of the microwave on the scale without the aluminum plate? * Was the aluminum replaced with a different plastic plate and tested to confirm no expected weight changes, if any, (per theory) as a control? Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Ron Kita<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 7:54 AM Subject: [Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity Paper 81-1608 On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:57 AM ron kita <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Greeting Bill et al, A cheap was well as interesting experiment on the late Dr Alzofon s AIAA 81-1608 Antigravity paper- seems to follow his teachings. 18 minites...highly interesting -IMHO. Comments are most welcomed. I visited the page 9 months ago according to the repiles. Ad astra, Ron..Chiralex Weight Loss in Aluminum? Gravity Control? Part 1<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkI2ebnpnvw> [https://s.yimg.com/nq/storm/assets/enhancrV2/23/logos/youtube.png] Weight Loss in Aluminum? Gravity Control? Part 1 Sadly, this technology seems to be completely ignored by establishment science. Developed by a respected physici...
