Sure, but "really strong aetheric energy" does not equal "a little bit of electrical energy", it's possible but could time an un-known amount of effort of negligible payoff.
There are many different forms of aetheric energy and not all are going to be read on a meter, and to be honest I'm not sure that something that lights an LED would be evidence of anything, I mean arrays of diodes can sometimes rectify enough environmental EM to light up. Also, if physical, there is a problem, people need to believe the video isn't faked (or caused by some conventional effect I have wrongly ascribed to aetheric) and they need to either replicate it, or send me money so I can send them one. Images are so practical, you can send them out in moments to people, they can change the image (improving or breaking it), re-create it (replicate it), do all sorts tests and try it on others. Then, they can put together a physical version with wire they might have lying around the house in as little as a few minutes. If the energy from images had to be subtle, then I wouldn't be trying this, but it is strong enough for some to be rather shocked. On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 AM Chris Zell <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like Pavlita stuff. > > > > Build a pyramid-thing that lights an LED by itself ( if that can be done). > Or some other simple inexplicable toy. > > > > *From:* Jonathan Berry <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:09 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Aetheric Science - Invitation to take part > > > > Thanks Harry... > > > > I had already made contact with Dean Radin (a scientist there who did a > google talk) and he seemed a little interested but it didn't go anywhere > back in 2017. My tech is stronger now so perhaps that could be > different this time. > > > > I tried now and rang several times going though to different extensions > with none answering (left a message on one), all the email addresses say > they don't answer emails, so we'll see what comes of that. > > > > It is very hard getting attention for something that looks more like the > realm of magical sigils or psychotronics, but that is just the means of > demonstrating the effect without needing to physically ship or recreate > material devices. > > > > Despite the easily demonstrated reality of the effect, despite the > applicability to hardware, despite the EXTREME promise of such technology, > it is hard, to find an iota of interest, and more likely the person is to > be "useful" to the objective on making this technology feasible the less > likely they are to hear the pitch. > > > > The appearance of this is killing it. I keep thinking that if I make it > strong enough, startling enough (the intensity people report feeling from > the images does increase as I improve the technology to a remarkable > degree, something that could not occur with a placebo effect) that at some > point it will be taken more seriously, and maybe it will... > > > > But, that won't happen if "USEFUL" people don't try it in the first place. > > > > > >
