https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-origin-of-time-bootstrapped-from-fundamental-symmetries-20191029/

An excerpt from the above link follows;


“The physicists employed a strategy known as the 
bootstrap<https://www.quantamagazine.org/using-the-bootstrap-physicists-uncover-geometry-of-theory-space-20170223/>,
 a term derived from the phrase “pick yourself up by your own bootstraps” 
(instead of pushing off of the ground). The approach infers the laws of nature 
by considering only the mathematical logic and self-consistency of the laws 
themselves, instead of building on empirical evidence. Using the bootstrap 
philosophy, the researchers derived and solved a concise mathematical equation 
that dictates the possible patterns of correlations in the sky that result from 
different primordial ingredients.

“They’ve found ways of calculating things that just look totally different from 
the textbook approaches,” said Tom 
Hartman<https://physics.cornell.edu/thomas-hartman>, a theoretical physicist at 
Cornell University who has applied the bootstrap in other contexts.

Eva Silverstein<https://sitp.stanford.edu/people/eva-silverstein>, a 
theoretical physicist at Stanford University who wasn’t involved in the 
research, added that the recent paper by Arkani-Hamed and collaborators is “a 
really beautiful contribution.” Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the work, 
Silverstein and others said, is what it implies about the nature of time. 
There’s no “time” variable anywhere in the new bootstrapped equation. Yet it 
predicts cosmological triangles, rectangles and other shapes of all sizes that 
tell a sensible story of quantum particles arising and evolving at the 
beginning of time.

This suggests that the temporal version of the cosmological origin story may be 
an illusion. Time can be seen as an “emergent” dimension, a kind of hologram 
springing from the universe’s spatial correlations, which themselves seem to 
come from basic symmetries. In short, the approach has the potential to help 
explain why time began, and why it might end. As Arkani-Hamed put it, “The 
thing that we’re bootstrapping is time itself.”
Wyttenbach’s  work on an  alternate nucleon model considering SO(4) physics 
also has suggested a temporal nature of time in lieu of a linear scale starting 
at the “beginning of the universe some 14 billion years ago.

Bob Cook

Reply via email to