QM and the derived problem of non locality is not a fundamental problem
of physics. It's the other way round a class of "religious" physicists
that never studied basic perception theory (& don't understand magnetism
..) or a how reality must be projected into our minds want's to make us
believe QM is fundamental and hence its problems are fundamental.
Throwing a brick (parameters homogeneous, weight, dimensions) for any
trajectory can be calculated by "Newton" Mechanics as this is symmetric
for the whole space but: QM is just working on a subset of the space and
for each subset it needs a new weight (gauge) and then only delivers and
approximation for a square integrable "sub reality".
Non-locality is just a problem generated by an incomplete approximate
model. Sample emission of a photon. This just looks like random or non
local because the orbit has 3D freedom. If you nail the magnetic spin
then photons are no longer emitted randomly. There is a preferred angle
relative to the spin axis - most obvious on nuclear/dense mass level.
A much better picture of non locality is the "latent" energy in a
magnetic field that seems to exist everywhere but only acts when it is
able to undergo a resonant action (coupling). In this moment a very
large wave seems to convert into something real at the point of
resonance. Now when we switch back to dense matter (QM..) we are back in
the phase space that allows instant reaction of a coupled magnetic mass
at any point of the surface.
Conclusion: Non locality is a consequence of magnetism just neglected in QM.
The real challenge is spooky action at distance as neither Shannon nor
Einstein did believe that this can happen with speed > c.
Historically the concept of information was interwoven with the
quantization of energy. In quantum information transmission there is no
flux of energy. Only the readout of human readable information needs a
constant amount of energy. But if two quantum computer talk then there
is (should be at least..) no flux of energy.
mixed-Extent. There is no "physics" that can do away with time. It's a
fundamental part of existence, so what are you really trying to achieve?
What "time free physics can do": It delivers all magneto static
solutions that define relations between mass and energy. This is the
basic structure of matter that is given by magnetic resonance finally
the phase space. This part of physics also explains charge and basic
properties of all particles.
Of course for all non static macroscopic interactions you need "time" -
you have to make a fix relation - to make them accessible/readable for
our "real" world.
Note that our perception of the flow of time and even our measurement of
it is based on processes which may vary in speed. IOW if the fabric of
space time changes, e.g. in a gravitational field, then the processes
upon which our clocks are based may speed up or slow down, but this
doesn't *necessarily* imply that time itself is flowing faster or
slower. It may be, but we have no object means of telling the
difference. IOW our temporal "yardstick" may change in length in some
situations. A clock can run fast or slow without the actual passage of
time changing. If our perceptions also run fast or slow along with the
clock, then we have no way of knowing that it's running fast or slow.
Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
All fields boil down to EM-fields see gravitation formula is SO(4) physics.
Thus all masses with equal dimensions of magnetic flux are always in resonance
that's why protons finally do attract protons based on so called gravitation.
This is the starting point of new physics far beyond GER and SM. Our mind is a
quantum computer not bound to time for making conclusions but moving my ass to
the fridge definitely takes some time...
So what is the reality? Ass or mind? Both? Affective/effective see also Plato's
Phaidon dialogue
J.W.
Am 11.04.20 um 23:22 schrieb [email protected]:
The non-locality is a interesting problem.
I am not sure that space parameters do not exist that are like
magnetic permeability and electric permittivity, but apply to
communication of information about the local energy (for example,
rotating magnetic flux) and angular momentum at other volumes of
separated space. And in addition other space parameters may act to
limit the density of energy and angular momentum in nearby space volumes.
Maybe Jurg can comment on this conjecture.
Bob Cook
*From: *H LV <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, April 11, 2020 9:43 AM
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *[Vo]:affective vs. effective communication
This illustrates the difference between affective and effective
communication.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/affective-vs-effective/
It could also be used as a guide for understanding the difference
between local and non-local communication.
The emotional state of the child affectively induces a change in the
emotional of the adult. This may happen non-locally even before the
image of the child reaches the adult's eyes. The change in the
emotional state of the adult is not certain but in this case the adult
effectively responds kindly by giving the child the teddy. The
transfer of the teddybear happens at less than the speed of light.
Harry
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
