Re: Stirring Syrup

[Colin Quinney]

Not too many folks are aware of the Aspden effect.

 

Anyway, thanks again. The effect was "troubling" me in the sense that I did not intuit why "both" directions worked, until you posted. Your analogy allows me to feel the Aspden effect from a perspective that's now fitting. That re-start effect with Aspden's motor was originally confusing because one expects the re-start force's preferred angular momentum should be in the same direction as the preceding direction. 

 

Or perhaps in the opposite direction as was suggested by a related mechanical/aether effect- the 1998 Harvey Morgan Experiment (IEEE paper).) It did not use rotating magnet flywheels. It used lead (Pb) flywheels.

 

http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_5_11_9.html

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/3354/kedrickbrown.html

 

If the Morgan experiment is replicated, it indicates a "reaction" counter-angular force NOT with the primary flywheel, but nearby-   in a secondary (spin-field detecting) flywheel that is adjacent to the primary flywheel, whose (non-contiguous) axle is in-line. A wind break or wind barrier must be utilized between the two flywheels.

 

IOW- The Morgan effect, if true, may only be a related aether effect. A study of not only aether viscosity but spin dynamics of fluids in motion may then explain both effects quite well. (Viscosity & vortex).

 

If these forces can be modelled in any way as gravito-magnetic forces, then I strongly suspect that they are many orders of magnitude beyond what current theory predicts. Something is therefore fishy. I wonder if Beta-atm can explain both effects?

 

Colin

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:24 AM

Subject: Re: Stirring Syrup

It has to be a Beta-atm or aether "viscosity" change because, when you
do the Aspden re-start, regardless of which way it first turned, it
takes less energy on the second turnup whether it's clockwise or
windershins!!!

Terry