Jones— One additional note: In my terminology x-rays originate from atomic electronic structure and gamma ray originate from isotope energy transitions.
Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 12:29 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion Jones— Peter’s ideas are not much different tan t mine. He looked for inner electrons of various atoms and their x-ray spectrum that had resonant energy transitions that couple with nuclear gamma isomeric energy states of a single isotope. I am not clear if Peter’s model considered all isomeric energies of all nuclear species in an entangled system. I do not consider that the physical model Peter considers valid for nucleons and their pertinence to the structure of larger isotopes matches nine which assumes that electrons, positrons and neutrinos are the primary entities that make up nucleons and heavier constituent particles. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 11:17 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: The reason why there is no gamma stems from the transfer of spin energy in small quanta of angular momentum—nuclear to electric—with the same entangled system—the crystalline lattice of the host material. The time frame may be very short—less than a femto- second. Bob OK. How is that explanation different from Hagelstein?