Thanks for sharing. This is great!
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 6:11 AM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The Shawyer EM drive is not dead but now has serious competition… using > lasers. This is almost a breakthrough but has not attracted much attention > so far.. > > > > > https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2020/09/darpa-laser-version-of-emdrive-has-a-test-result-better-than-commercial-ion-drive.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fadvancednano+%28nextbigfuture%29 > > > > Despite the negativism from skeptics (all over the Web), the EM drive > concept is now approaching the status of a solid technology despite NASA > dropping it. > > > > What’s with NASA dropping something like this??? Almost unforgiveable. > > > > Fortunately DARPA/ARPA did not give up and the latest results seem to be > fabulous (when and if they are duplicated). > > > > Long video from Mike McCulloch > > > > https://youtu.be/341Yk4k51uY > > > > From the Next Big Future comments: This is related to Mike McCulloch's > “quantized inertia” QI theory which itself is related yet different from > the usual Mach effect and Emdrive drama. > > > > McCulloch has a theory for inertia that predicts galaxies' rotation sans > dark matter, distant binaries and other anomalies presumably without > adjustment, and it has other several interesting implications. It explains > the Emdrive and predicts several kinds of inertia-based drives using EM > waves of different efficiencies…. To call it controversial is an > understatement. > > > > In a way it is refreshing to get rid of the baggage of dark matter. It has > always smelled a bit like a klutz concept… unless of course it is the > “aether” > > > > > > >
