On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 4:20 PM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > - If hydrinos are just more stable versions of isolated hydrogen atoms > they should have been discovered in hydrogen gas using old technology many > decades ago. But this is just a strawman argument against their existence. > > > > Harry > > > > What old technology, exactly, would have discovered them? That is an > intriguing path to follow > > > > BTW it could be a “fundable” inquiry involving a deeper look at old data.. > should anyone here be looking for a new project. > > > > H* would have almost the same mass as hydrogen - but would be so much > denser that it probably cannot react chemically in the same way, so they > are relatively inert. > > > > For instance, there is unlikely to be found in nature a form of water > where one of the protons is replaced with dense hydrogen as this could > present a charge imbalance. > > > > It would be worth the effort to find the most likely place dense hydrogen > should be found in nature (assuming it is real) > > > > My guess is that it would be in biological lifeforms which use it for > survival, somehow. > > > > Jones > Look for abnormally high energetic emissions from a hot hydrogen gas. That would be evidence of hydrogen relaxing below the ground state. The probability of the formation of hydrinos in an ideal gas would be very low.. However, I think the probability might increase as the gas got cooler. This would be in contrast with the probability of fusion increasing as the temperature of the gas increased. Harry Harry
