Hello vortex-l,
*Premise:* Penrose-Hameroff *Orch OR Theory *proposed protein nanotube *is proper*ly identified as the interface of spirit with brain. By Penrose logic, the brain does not generate mind, but is a transceiver interface composed of protein nanotubes that burst into quantum resonance about 40 times a second. You and me are minds in the aether activating quantum relaxation oscillators to be you and me, per Sir Penrose and Dr. Hameroff. In the PH model, quantum resonance decays through the Fibonacci spirals of a protein nanotube to ultimaltely afford 'when' a neuron fires. The electrons of the nanotubes resonate with energy within the quantum noise-floor (my term) between the atoms of the nanotubes. Is this a proper grammatical construct for the *Orch OR Theory*? Druthers? Assume the signal propagation of mind is in the aether plenum and is superluminal and scalar (all directions isotropically). By that assumption, 'mind' in the aetheric plenum is a zero-dimensional oscillation over time, I think. Is 'zero-dimensional' the proper notation for a signal that varied in quality nearly** everywhere at once? **nearly: superluminal is not infinite. Let's huddle. If every neuron is synchopated with the aether, then every neuron is simultaneously aware of the same signal of 0-D mind in the aether. If mind is superluminal, then every neuron active in our pulse-field of brain-mind is tuned as a whole to one signal, our mind in the aether. Thoughts, please? Might there be some hint of simultaneity that may be sensorized within our gray matter? -don
