Hi Bob!
I'm glad Jürg covered the scientific side of questions 1-7.
As a practitioner, a.k.a. newbie woodworker, my formal science is
loose. But intuition can be formal, yet once-removed from
communication. "I can feel it, Dave" --Hal, 2001 Space Odyssey
/*
*/
/*1. Does a magnetic vector imply 3 space dimensions or only 1*/
3-space yes. The vector length represents the amplitude. 3-Space vector
notation is just [x,y,z] or some such syntax. A point location in
3-space is a three-part notation.
My yet undomesticated human considers a magnetic compass to be a good
analog of a unit vector expressing the magnetic alignment. Leo Vuyk made
a 3D magnetic unit vector for geomagnetic studies. (Where 'unit' refers
to the magnetic needle length, which doesn't indicate magnetic intensity.)
Detanglement in the Fibonacci-neighbor knot-ratio WILL CREATE (amateur
prophesy alert <--saw it in POVRay) a step-phase magnetic-rotation
tangentially across the 'torus surface,' per se, composed of close
windings of a 13:8 knot 3-group (39 helical loops total), which change
magnetic polarity in a wave-motion across the torus, and around and
through the hole.
So, if a neodymium sphere magnet were to roll on the surface of the
3-phase electrified Fibbonacci-knot donut, the neo sphere would chase
the 'vector' wave (of magnetic polarity alignment) around the surface
and through the hole and repeat. The direction of the magnetic polarity
at any one time in the magnetic cycle is represented by a magnetic vector.
**math: maths, a pluralization of a short form of a pluralization,
exposing average skill of mathematicians for spoken grammar,
exacerbated by YouTube algorithms under monitization incentives,
accepted by the hoi polloi because it's fun to correct people in
combat-chat.
Common 3-phase industrial motors create a rotating magnetic-vector field
in the stationary core. The rotor is spun by the eddie-drag against the
rotating field.
/*
*/
/*2. Is a magnetic field as described by Maxwell also implied?*/
As the magnetic device concept in discussion, I'm doing normal current
through copper tube or strap through power MOSFET-s, and search for
timing domain anomaly in the waves in the vector-field. But if you
watch me, nothing moves. Those are now only tangible as thoughts used
to reckon lines on an oscilloscope with multiple options on the knobs
<-- while alert for transistor smoke. Kidding. Sort of.
And Maxwell is cool. It works for wires in loops. But but, the
Aharonov-Bohm effect (Hooper's Motional field?, or something buried in
the double-spiral flux-capacitor concept?) is wrapping the whole torus
at a right angle to the magnetic alignment-progression ?
What becomes of A-B effects at complete system resonance? Bill B.
confirms a rotary resonant basin is achievable (I waited years to hear
that, Bill.)
And more thoughts could put an Arduino talking to an FPGA to keep the
golden orb encapsulating the whole affair <-- pending hired help and a
billion dollars plus five to fifty years, and more billions.
The 'orb' is in the timing domain. That is realized later by analysis
using periodic sampling and more hired geewiz algorithms in a box.
Hunt for the cross-time agency, locate the signal and lock-on, then
amplify and massage as a new play pretty, and post images nobody
believes, and dance a jig in the fab-lab.
And the timing-domain is realized by time-based arithmetic on fast
processors, fast-enough that human-sense control-response may appreciate
a fly-through of 'live' dynamics afforded by all the blinky stuff on a
little circuit board. Fly-through a conceptual representamina of
dimensionalized cross-time spectral dynamics of edge-jitter in a
ring-oscillator <--before doing something uninvited by the consequence
of feeling in the dark (beyond the light of mind). Like Madame Curie.
I've heard lots of tales. And then Bill emphasizes the same caution.
/*3. Are there any intrinsic magnetic physical parameters associated
with a space dimension(s)?*/
Where 'space dimensions' may refer to the physical space occupied by a
resonant GOTK ...
A knot entangles poloidal current winding around the donut axis the
coils are wound upon. <--- This generates a north-south magnetic field
component of the system whole, but likely appears in the far-field as a
dipole.
A knot has toroidal-components, and their component is locked within the
donut-ring as a ring-o-flux, closed on itself. This magnetic polarity
isn't reaching out, but at RF will have Aharonov-Bohm effects, and may
serve to 'determine' the topology of the emergent resonant structure
when this golden copper donut is tortured with all manor of wattage at a
crazy noise spread <--aiming for the calm under system bifurcation that
could pop rivets <-- frog ear tech.
Oh but wait. Picture the spinning lamp one stared into, flashing light
on one's face to induce meditate states. Within one could visually
identify patterns, but only if it spun. Popular in New York City back
in the day.
The 3-phase electrification may occur in an operating sequence where
time-domain of electrical-conductor-current is overlapping in space with
other entanglements, such as when the whole thing falls into a
system-rotary resonance, 'things' emerge that are parts of other phases
in other sectors and times in a resonant envelop of rotary resonance.
Thanks for verifying that phenomenon, Bill B., of rotary-component of
resonant storage, and characteristic inductance.
So, if rotary-apparitions 'emerge' as stabilities over pulse-timing
contributed-into by various electrification phases, then perhaps any
sort of magnetic signature could be added to the resonant nest. But
don't confuse this with a programmable, macro-quantum-dot.
/*4. What is magnetic flux? (Flux implies a flow of something,)*/
I dunno.
I suspect it is action at a distance transmitted on aether-media as
scalar wave-forms between two points acting as force-coupled pairs. The
scalar waveform has amplitude, and contains directionality (vector
notational components describing direction in matrix (tablular) form)
Personally, because 'lines' are used in illustrations for magnetic field
lines, I see no reason to consider flux is consisting of lines. Things
will organize in lines within flux. It is hard to engineer an
abstraction, but the description of behavior is good to do. And protons
aren't tiny billiard balls.
/*5. Is magmatic flux related to the angular momentum?*/
I wish I knew. In a superconductor, cooper-pair resonance (harmonically
coupled into a superconducting ring) acquires actual physical angular
momentum, I read.
I read the Toroidal Power Unit (TPU) of Steven Marks had a
gyroscopic-like inertial resistance when held and moved --I think <--
Anyone? Do I recall that properly?
/*6. Is angular momentum a quantized physical parameter or dimension?*/
/**/Not a clue. But, Jürg mentions the SO(4) theory as using Fibonacci
numbers that are neighbors in the Fibonacci sequence to build a knot ratio.
If a knot were rubber, and could be twisted about the toroidal axis
tighter...
A 12.1:8 'fractional' torus knot:
https://groupkos.com/dev/index.php?title=File:Torus_knot_bifilar_12.1-8_4-trefoils_fractional_expanding_07.png
<https://groupkos.com/dev/index.php?title=File:Torus_knot_bifilar_12.1-8_4-trefoils_fractional_expanding_07.png>
which is not real, but exemplifies a possible rule of
unit-angular-momentum in a torus knot in some sense somewhere.
A 12:8 is the same as a 3:2 knot, winding over itself four times.
A fractional knot, increasing from p=12.1 toward 13:8 knot ratio will
pass through a 5:3 knot, and will then pass through an 8:5, to become a
13:8 knot.
All of these knots occur while the poloidal winding tighten by only
2Pi. I.e., one extra axial twist (poloidal around the axis) will range
from the 3:2 to the 13:8.
Note that 'ranging' through the knots passes the loops through
collisions. I would assume a flux of polarized medium would form a
barrier or opposition, causing an angular-valence, per se. Or
spin-velocity quanta of 2Pi Fibonacci-neighbors fraction.
That's 2Pi / 13:8 omega band-gap of the angular momentum valence
notch... maybe?
Or is that angular-torque? Add more torque for more clicks in the
gradient of notches at the Fibonacci harmonics.
How does one twist the flux core of an SO(4) torus knot?
The twist is torqued against what? Is the torus knot inner loops
twisted against the outer knot loops? {IS THAT SMITH'S TENSOR FIELD
VEHICLE OF EFFECT?}
Interesting: As the 3:2 knot is twisted-up tighter (axially), the
helical slope of the knot, as a helix going around the donut, starts at
p/q = slope
3/2= 1.5
5/3=1.667
8/5=1.6
These values oscillate asymptotically toward the golden ratio
(Phi=1.61803...) as larger values of Fibonacci pairs are used as knot
ratios, like 55:34 (1.6176...)
/*7. Is space a real physicals dimensiom(s) continuous to 0 ?*/
I'm clueless. But if there is no texture limit, then a self-collapsing
energy-moment wouldn't stop collapsing, at any scale. Turtle-finity.
As a clueless amateur, more information about plausible experimental
designs can be absorbed (the good with the bad), and then over time the
things that don't work are realized (while learning) to be implausible
as imagineered. Known working components are engineered to work as a
test of conjecture of the working whole. The works of the whole is what
is luring me backwards (reverse-engineering from disclosure info, 2013,
heaped on a lifetime of Bill Beaty's list, et al). A picture-puzzle,
but there's no picture on it.
There's some sort of phase-inversion or topological coalescence or
self-tightening pinch or some such going on that seems to be a missing
ingredient in 'the unhelpful' sort of information.
Wilbert B. Smith** realized a power-threshold before copper Caduceus
windings on a hollow ferrite core would produce scalar oscillation and
establish a discontinuity in the flow of time, a 'tempic field.'
**Detected 1st UFO for Canadian gov. on my birthday in 1954, and
built a 'tensor beam' coil from information not sourced from Canada.
*
*
*Dawn your hats*
Smith's coil, at 10 kilowatts of RF power, operating inside a sealed
brass tube, fed by coaxial feed from an AM transmitter, per my amateur
purview --dawn tin hats now--> structuralized the black body energy to
afford a tempic wave. I.e., the 'men upstairs' provided specs to form a
standing Znidarsic wave which has harmonic gradients that couple into
nucleo-sonic thermal energy (black body energy --when aligned in
topographic structure-- imprint proton-field, or matter lattice,
strain-regions, electronically dimpling BB potential over a gradient).
This means there are LENR principles embedded in the Smith tensor beam
technology, "I can feel it, Dave."
/*Bob and Vortex People*/
What are your wild hunches on Smith?
Cheers,
Don
Amateur engineer and newbie woodworker
On 4/2/2021 4:42 PM, [email protected] wrote:
DON AND JURG-- --
QUESTIONS:
1. Does a magnetic vector imply 3 space dimensions or only 1
2. I s a magnetic field as described by Maxwell also implied?
3. Are there any intrinsic magmatic physical parameters associated
with a space dimension(s)?
4. What is magnetic flux? (Flux implies a flow of something,)
5. Is magmatic flux related to the angular momentum?
6. Is angular momentum a quantized physical parameter or dimension?
7. Is space a real physicals dimensiom(s) continuous to 0 ?
Bob Cook
*From: *Don <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Wednesday, March 31, 2021 2:43 PM
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Texture of magnetic vector rotation in a special
knot group
Hi Jürg!
On 3/31/2021 7:38 AM, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote (about what Don wrote below):
Did you notice that the knots are based on Fibonacci numbers?
The same as in SO(4) physics torus knots! The magic of flux
partition!
J.W.
I'm not sure what you are asking, Jürg.
If you mean, did I notice the numbers are in the Fibonacci sequence,
then, yup. I was searching through parametric substitutions using
ray-tracing rendering and animated search sequences, with all manor of
golden and platonic combinations over the years.
If you mean, did /I /notice or discover the Fibonacci number thing,
rather than develop from another's work, the answer is still yes.
This is golden stuff of my compulsive amateur curiosity, and the
golden torus knot seems mapped out to my satisfaction, now, so that
the nickles in my pocket are beginning to itch for want of parts to
assemble. I wanted to (think I) know what I was doing before I spent
part of our grocery and vice budget. Now I'm out of excuses.
Or did you mean to ask something other?
---
My curiosity-vectored search has over the years seemed to have a mind
of its own (Zen-vectored moments of pondering). I'm really surprised
after the system design closure of principle last September that the
solution was a unique arrangement, but an arrangement of concepts I
knew well (enough) for years. Also, for me, layers of
head-jolting-synchronicites kept motivation to keep searching at a
high level.
Thank you for your curiosity!
-Don
Amateur Engineer and Newbie Woodworker, Director of Bucket List
Operations (BLO)
Phi = 5^.5 * .5 + .5 <-- In case all the other keys on your calculator
are stuck
On 31.03.2021 15:13, Don wrote:
Hello Vortex People,
This is some serious stuff to me as a hobby. I call it a
hobby so people won't think I'm too serious.
But seriously, a certain group of knots on the same donut
afford a golden opportunity to get organized and orderly on
the torus surface <-- with a magnetic vector wave continually
revolving at velocity by frequency per scale.
A certain group of entangled knots affords what I always
thought was going to be easy to do. Well, just winding a
helix around a donut multiple times, entangling with the
earlier windings, and connecting where it started as a
'smooth' torus knot, gets the surface-velocity-timing of the
vector rotation all mixed up. Don't despair!
---
Brought to you by shear boredom during panedemania...
There is a way to wind a group of smooth torus knots on a
torus surface, in such a way that the torus knots are
energized in step-phased electrical current, smoothly and
continuously over the surface.
The trick is not a 'way to do it', but which knots to smoothly
entangle when separated by 120 degrees each around the donut
<-- and this trick appears and disappears by the number of
entangled phases. This focus will be only about 3-phase.
The answer of which knot to use is --> 13:8 <-- The p:q knot
ratio turns around the torus axis (p) and helical loops
through the torus hole (q). Or, that's my personal choice.
The 3:2 knot, the 13:8, and the 55:34 are the first three
knots which also share the quality of 1) q = even number, and
2) p and q are adjacent numbers in the Fibonacci sequence.
---
Hot or Knot?
What's your vote as a sensible knot for prototype studies
toward revolving a magnetic vector tangentially and
continuously around the surface of a golden donut (by torus
profile) at a golden slope through the torus plane, and a
golden slope from the axis through the torus hole?
---
Why q = even numbers?
Because, for even q-s, the electrical connection points for
bifilar conduction are diametrically opposite each other on
the outer circumference of the donut.
So? Because then, electrical connection is performed away
from the torus center hole, and all connections for 3-phase
group of knots on a donut are done on a six-point layout, as a
hexagon. A magnetic self-resonance on the knot group (at a
few megaHz of ring-amp tail-chase current-reversals for
maximized delta-B) will have minimal magnetic interference
leading away from the magnetic surface of the copper array, a
copper wound donut. There's nothing in the center hole of the
donut but the hole (and perhaps some target for study, like a
very thin film of nano-fibers for hosting plasmon resonance as
a emergent-topology enticement for over-driven states.
---
Why Fibonacci neighbors?
Beside being an approximation of the golden ratio, the
Fibonacci knot ratios produce this curious de-tangling of
entangled knot helices.
Each knot self-entangles its own windings, and when two are
entangled on the same donut (none touch, the loops are between
the first knot's loops) there is yet an entangled pattern on
the torus surface.
But wait! The 3-group on a donut magically detangles, and the
knots beginning from three points of the compass lay-out in
contiguous phase-order, and more.
When a third Fibonacci knot is wound between two other knots
on a donut, all smooth, even, non-touching, and symmetric,
then two geometric structures appear in the order and current
flow along the surface of the knot:
1) The left-handed and the right-handed helices (the
bifilar halves) are grouped contiguously, symmetrically,
and in sequence; and
2) The phase order is natural as phaseA, phaseB, phaseC,
phaseA, phaseB, phaseC.... across the entire surface.
Which is what I thought would happen in the beginning when
one just wound a bunch of wire on a donut. Nu uh. But
now you know.
---
How can this be?
Without knowing the proper terminology, suffice to say it is
about dissonance near an integer. The golden ratio creates an
even distribution on a plane in seed-heads of plants, or
phylotaxy of leaves on a stem, but entangling golden
entanglements on a golden donut creates a sorted progression
of polarity and phase. I be happy.
---
What this is?
This is about reverse-engineering attempts to design 'it' to
comply with what's not known to not work. No government funds
were used, or animals harmed (not counting my neurons).
---
What size this is?
It's about a foot across the outer diameter of the copper
wound donut. The hole of the donut is about a quarter of an
inch" (6 mm). There will be 39 helical twists in 3-phases,
with about 50 foot total copper conductor (likely flat
conductor for the close spacing in the hole.
---
What power's this geometric magic knot array?
Something like two D.C. arc-welders in series for a power
equivalence, as an over-engineered prototype build. As a
test-device, this leaves room for adjustment.
Whirls,
Don
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
