'Fire and brimstone' talk stifles curiousity.

Harry


On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 5:06 PM William Beaty <bi...@eskimo.com> wrote:
>
>
> >   magnetic burned match heads (also a homopolar motor next)
> >   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOBmIyu7B30&t=262s
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021, Michael Foster wrote:
>
> > I have no idea why this subject continues to be controversial
>
> Irrational semi-religious belief-systems are the obvious issue.
>
>    "LENR is for fools, transmutation outside of conventional MeV
>    reactions just demonstrates incompetence or dishonesty."
>
> Once a researcher (or a whole academic department, or an entire research
> community) has spoken the above phrase, they cannot go back.  Their
> skepticism is no longer skepticism.  Their admitting error is no longer
> admitting error: if they turn out to be wrong, it requires confronting the
> fact that they've joined the "bad guys," and they've been actively halting
> progress in the sciences.  (When careers are on the line, truth doesn't
> matter, and such a thing must be resisted at any cost ...on pain of public
> embarrassment, or career- destruction, or even on pain of death, because
> "If P&F turned out to be correct, then I'd have to go out and slit my own
> throat." )
>
>
> > slightest. There are any number of carbon arc configurations that produce
> > elemental transmutation of carbon to iron. I have done this repeatedly
>
>    "Your carbon was obviously contaminated by iron!  Which became concen-
>    trated by orders, as all the carbon exits the arc as CO2!!!"
>
> Yeah right, so we don't even consider using ultra-pure spectrographic rods
> (which display no detectable Fe emission lines in the first place.)
> Instead we arc-transmute the far purer plasma-grown pyro graphite.  But
> that doesn't matter, since 1) we'd just be accused of intentional hoaxes
> and 2) no reputable researcher would ever replicate this simple test,
> because if they demonstrated LENR, it would convert them into Believer-
> crackpots.
>
> > myself. The last time, years ago, I used spectroscope grade carbon rods to
> > make sure of lack of contamination. And yes, you get magnetically separable
> > particles as a result. For those who are wont to believe this must be some
> > sort of magnetic pyrolytic graphite, it's easy to test chemically proving
> > that these particles are indeed iron. Just dissolve in dilute sulfuric acid,
> > and react with potassium ferricyanide. If you get that characteristic
> > Prussian blue color, it's iron. Case closed.
>
> I'm still tempted to try the other one: that Kervran science-fair
> experiment.  But I'm not sure that faculty here would dare allow it.
> That's the version with two quartz sample tubes containing identical water
> and seeds, one then sprouted, both converted to ash, then elemental-
> analyze the ash (which should be identical, but supposedly the
> sprouted-seed ash displays extra elements.)  A few ICP spectrometers here,
> and piles of mass-specs, so, not difficult to eliminate artifacts
> associated with any one test method.  But if it works, then UW chem
> department becomes the new P&F, who'd originally heard rumors of some
> obscure crackpot claim involving hydrogen and platinum, and discovered
> that it was real, to their everlasting chagrin.  And credit.
>
>
> > These are the same bunch who will discredit this simple experiment until
> > their dying breath, no matter how incontrovertible it is.
>
> The ones who refuse Galileo's Telescope, we simply wait for them to die.
>
> Then their students (or more probably, after generations) their students'
> students' students quietly accept the results, since after all, they've
> been hearing about Cold Fusion ever since they learned to read, and
> clearly no sane researcher ever objected to CMNS, so what's the big deal?
>
> It's not individuals who follow the dishonest face-saving procedure below,
> it's also the entire scientific community as a whole...
>
>   "Theories have four stages of acceptance:
>       1. this is worthless nonsense
>       2. this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view
>       3. this is true, but quite unimportant
>       4. I've always said so."
>      - J.B.S. Haldane, 1963
>
> PS
>
> Buy LENR comic books to contaminate young minds!   Donate copies to your
> local dentist office (or even library, if anyone still goes to libraries:)
>
>    Discover Cold Fusion
>    https://www.curtis-press.com/product-category/comics/
>
>
> (((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) ))))))))))))))))
> William J. Beaty            http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/
> beaty, chem washington edu  Research Engineer
> billb, amasci com           UW Chem Dept,  Bagley Hall RM74
> x3-6195                     Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700

Reply via email to