At 06:49 pm 08/03/2006 -0900, Horace wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Mitchell Swartz wrote:
>
>>
>> Record Set for Hottest Temperature on Earth: 3.6 Billion Degrees in
>> Lab
>> ====================================================
>> "Scientists have produced superheated gas exceeding temperatures of
>> 2 billion degrees Kelvin, or 3.6 billion degrees
>> Fahrenheit. ...They don't know how they did it.
>
>
> The result may be due to establishing an efficient nuclear heat
> sampling regime that taps zero point energy from the nuclei. See:
>
> http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/HeisenbergTraps.pdf
I was very interested in the following para. from the above
paper of yours, Horace.
------------------------------------------------
This has to happen without cracking the lattice,
which is apparently the difficult part.
When the lattice cracks the gas in the vicinity
leaks and confinement is ended. Large parts of
an electrode volume have cracks and thus there
is a steady flow of hydrogen into and out of a
cathode, which precludes
electron trapping in those volumes.
------------------------------------------------
This ties in rather neatly with the generation of Beta-atmosphere
vacua in the cavitation spaces that form when specimens of ductile
metals, such as mild steel, are pulled apart in tension tests.
Passing a massive current through wires is equivalent to failing
them by axi-symmetric pressure (shades of Percy Bridgman) which is
equivalent to tension and the basis of the indirect tension test
invented at the Building Research Station.
Goodness me - Maybe they are the first people to have achieved
demonstrable cold fusion. What a laugh. 8-)
And though superficially that suggestion might seem like an
oxymoron, it isn't.
I suspect what is happening is that the failing of the wires
in effective tension is opening up very high Beta-atmosphere
vacua cavities in which nuclear processes are taking place.
In other words things are cold initially and only heat up when
the nuclear cavity reactions have taken place.
One only needs to examine the nuclear ash left behind after
the experiment to prove this one way or the other.
Cheers,
Frank Grimer
