I wouldn't worry too much about Puthoff

Puthoff took an interest in the Church of Scientology
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology> in the late 1960s and
reached what was then the top OT VII
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_Thetan> level by 1971.[3]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff#cite_note-Urban-3> Puthoff
wrote up his "wins" for a Scientology publication, claiming to have
achieved "remote viewing <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing>"
abilities.[4] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff#cite_note-4> In
1974, Puthoff also wrote a piece for Scientology's *Celebrity* magazine,
stating that Scientology had given him "a feeling of absolute fearlessness".
[5] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff#cite_note-5> Puthoff
severed all connection with Scientology in the late 1970s.[6]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff#cite_note-6>

On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 16:30, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jones,
>
> I now have Earthtech's MOAC (calorimeter) in my lab and I am refurbishing
> and re-commissioning it.  Earthtech is now closed and they are emptying
> their building.
>
> The Griggs device was not tested in the MOAC calorimeter.  I spoke with
> the engineers who built MOAC and who also tested the Griggs device.  They
> measured the actual torque and RPM going into the cavitator (hence they
> measured the mechanical input power).  I didn't ask how they measured the
> heat output.  Their conclusion was no excess heat.  That's about all I know
> about the experiment.
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>  Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_5220694793293478513_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 7:41 AM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Bob Higgins wrote:
>>
>> BTW, I was told that Earthtech testing of the Griggs device did NOT show
>> excess heat.  The testing process was described to me.
>>
>>
>> Hey Bob - that null result does not surprise me but is it really
>> meaningful?
>>
>> Earthtech has a precision calorimeter which can accommodate small
>> cavitation devices but as Rothwell has stated in the past, the Griggs
>> machine is about 1000 times too large to be tested by them. He says that Ga
>> Tech did test the device and found net thermal gain but, sadly, those
>> results are not to be found on the WWW for unknown reasons ... so... it
>> looks like an open issue.
>>
>> I wish someone would do the definitive testing of the large machine and
>> have the courage to defend positive results if found.
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to