The largest study of Ivermectin prophylaxes has been made in Argentina:
http://pharmabaires.com/1739-resultados-positivos-del-%20protocolo-iver-car-en-la-profilaxis-de-los-agentes-de-salud.html
I usually take high dose V-D3 and zinc as a preparation. this is the
best and most simple proven prophylaxis. Some add Quercetin since early 2020
PLEASE stop such FUD:: You said:: The best I've seen on this are
people that do that, get infected, wind up hospitalized and/or dead.
Yes we exactly know why the pseudo vaccines stop to work after some time.
In case of Pfizer & Moderna & Astra "vaccine" we talk of an
*experimental gen therapy*! A gen therapy that for 30% works in cancer
therapy...
The Pfizer gen therapy according sound research does not imply a useful
immune memory = has no vaccine like action. (that produces a broad
immune memory pattern)
The gen therapy just forces, mostly endothelian cells, to intake &
replicate the spike protein, what in follow up presentation reaction
stimulates the production of spike antibodies only.
This " pseudo vaccine" never helps to stimulate/produce new antibodies
after an infection with CoV-19. Only the surviving - but waning - anti
bodies help to fight an illness.
In UK & Israel the efficiency of the gen therapy already reached "0"
level for some age groups and important to know. Boosters will make
things worse. According the UK Covid report number 22 double vaccinated
have a higher viral load than single vaccinated!!!! This is a clear sign
of ADE = antibody dependent enhancement due to a miss fit between gen
therapy induce monoclonal antibodies and the new, no longer matching
Delta spike.
Only scared to death or "mad" people kill them selves with an
experimental gen therapy.
The pseudo vaccines already did produce some 100'000 crippled people.
The gen therapy has > 1000x more adverse reactions (see VERS) than the
worst flu vaccine.
See also https://www.adrreports.eu/de/disclaimer.html go to letter "C"
there you find all > 1 mio adverse reactions in the EU.
J.W.
On 10.09.2021 16:28, CB Sites wrote:
Jürg Wyttenbach says;
"Ivermectin gives a 100% protection from a COV-19 infection. Start
dose is 2 days normal dose then weekly once for 100% protection for
90% protetion every 2 weeks."
And you know this to be true? So are you following your own treatment
plan? The best I've seen on this are people that do that, get
infected, wind up hospitalized and/or dead. At least you won't have
lice when you die. It seems ironic that you would be willing to
trust one pharmaceutical (ivermectin) and not another (the vax, the
jab aka; Phiser, Moderna, J&J vaccines) that have been studied inside
and are well published and documented. We know exactly how and why
the vax works against covid. Yet someone with a home remedy that is
used to treat lice infections, thinks there is a better solution even
though there is no known science that would show how it protects
against covid or any other virus for that matter. Ivermectin is just
one more of the big lies like Hydroxychloroquine or even injections of
'sodium hypochlorite'. Remember that crazy one that the
science community had to be put down as fast as possible before people
killed themselves?
I really wish you would take your propaganda and keep it to yourself
and get your vax instead of wasting everyone time. There are better
subjects like Cold Fusion for us to sort out.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch
<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>> wrote:
You cannot teach Jed
As member of the FM the ruling USA sect he has to spread, what his
buddies tell him else he will get problems.
Others would say it more rigorously. In case of the Mizuno LENR
protocol he intentionally did spread wrong details. So he is a
professional cheater.
We know this because in the mean time the Mizuno patent is
available that refutes all rubbish Jed did claim.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1
<https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6017-mizuno-replication-and-materials-only/?pageNo=1>
Regarding Ivermectin:: Doing an RCT study for a deadly illness is
a sign of mental illness. But exactly this is what Jed references.
RCT studies for CoV-19 can only be done among very mild cases that
are completely irrelevant for the medical outcome of the pandemic.
Nevertheless. All these studies show what I said 2 mails earlier.
If you take Ivermectin then after 2 days CoV-19 is gone.
The best such study comes from Israel and does a full PCR control
on each day!
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1
<https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1> OF
course big pharma never references it....
J.W.
On 10.09.2021 03:11, Jonathan Berry wrote:
Oh Jed you really do just love the Pharma lies don't you.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
First off there have been no deaths ever from overdosing with it,
a woman who took x100 times the recommended dosage was fine after
4 days in hospital.
The negative effects from it are rare, mild and mostly related
either to insane dosing (which is a result of it not being
prescribed by doctors) and it killing parasites that release toxins.
But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive but to do it justice
I'll do that in another post, but the fact remains if there is no
harm (except to parasites and apparently Cancer) then why oppose
people trying it?
Why are they making up lies about it flooding emergency rooms
when the hospital has never treated anyone for it ever?
Why are they making up fake studies that don't exist?
Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful
spike protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm?
Why are trying to make it harder to enter accounts of Vaccine
harm in the VARS database? They have been caught making it
intentionally hard with slow loading and timeouts in the Canadian
system.
All for a Virus that finally it has been admitted Faucci lied
about, & was involved with making, the evidence for it being gain
of function research.
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:14, Jed Rothwell
<jedrothw...@gmail.com <mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch
<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>> wrote:
We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real
data from 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry
CoV-19.
Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that
ivermectin had an effect in India. They were interviewed in
the New York Times and elsewhere. Epidemiologists are better
at judging these things than doctors in the field. Doctors
have often been mistaken about the efficacy of a drug. The
epidemiologists say the curves of the recent outbreaks
indicate the epidemic abated because of natural herd immunity
in the hard hit districts. The doctors took antibody tests
from a sample of the population. They found that the
infection rate was far higher than official statistics
showed. It was high enough to achieve local herd immunity.
Local herd immunity is why there are multiple waves of an
epidemic in different cities over time.
Double-blind tests of ivermectin show either a very small
effect, or none at all, so it is not possible it has had a
giant effect on the Indian population. The doctors in the
field are not more skilled in administering the drug than the
doctors doing the double-blind tests. The doctors in the
field have described their methods, dosage and so on.
Clinical double-blind tests did not replicate their claims.
When a drug has a small effect at best, the way ivermectin
does, the only way to confirm that effect is with a double
blind test.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
