more... The means to extract energy from a Higgs mode system is to destroy the coherence in the system to harvest the energy created by the Higgs mechanism. Think of an alternating current where power is not realized unless there is movement of electrons in the wire.
So too with magnon coherence, the energy deposited in the spin wave is not realized unless the decoherence in the spin wave is destroyed, this is why there is a destabilizing magnetic field applied to the billet that destroys the coherence in the magnon condensate. In order to achieve this rapidly alternating Bose condensation in the magnons, the magnet must be set so that it is easy to continually distort the magnetic order on a razor's edge in the magnet to milk the energy out of the magnon condensate. A part of the setup in an over unity magnetic system is to weaken the magnet through conditioning to the point that its magnon condensate can be rapidly switched off and on with ease using a competing but weaker demagnetizing countering magnetic field provided by a surrounding wired network. On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:56 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding: "progress in understanding the Manelas mechanism" > > Condensed matter science has a property within the phenomena of > superconductivity and anisotropic quantum magnets called "Higgs mode". > > This mode is the keystone to unlocking the energy contents of space/time > because it allows bubbles of false vacuum to be generated. > > Stable Higgs mode in anisotropic quantum magnets > https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.02498 > > What Dr. Ahern saw in the MANELAS system that could extract energy from > space/time similar to how EVOs (as per ken Shoulders) function using the > Higgs mode from an anisotropic quantum magnet. > > Quantum dimer magnet > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dimer_magnet > > In the MANELAS system, the magnetic fields applied to the Manelas billet > produced a Bose condensate of magnons. > > The Bose-Einstein condensation in quantum dimer systems is, at its > essence, a field-induced magnetically ordered state that comes about from > the Zeeman splitting of the triplet states. The bosons of the Bose-Einstein > condensate can be thought of as the component of the spin parallel to the > applied magnetic field, reaching a maximum when the spins become polarized > by the field. The difference between the Bose-Einstein condensation and a > typical ordered state is the spontaneous breaking of the spin's U(1) > symmetry (i.e. the circular symmetry transverse to an applied magnetic > field). This spontaneous symmetry breaking gives rise to a > pseudoNambu-Goldstone Boson as in the Higgs mechanism > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM Brian Ahern <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Excess energy and magnetic cooling seem to poke up every now and then. It >> is difficult for even the most dedicated technologists to connect phonons >> with magnons. >> >> >> I have had some unique experience with this interaction during my tenure >> as a Staff Sientist at USAF Rome Lab in Lexington MA. I 1988 I was tasked >> to understand the new cuprate superconductors. By shear luck I discovered >> that MIT Professor Keith Johnson had solved the problem five years earlier. >> In fact, his 1983 paper presented in Zurich directed Bednors and Meuller to >> work on the cuprates. Bedorz was the leader of the conference in 1983. >> >> >> He found that the superconduction arises when the Born-Oppenheimer >> conditions are not met. That is, when the valence electron motion is >> coupled to vibrational modes. The electrons are in molecular orbitals and >> magnetism exists under very specific orbital topologies. >> >> >> So magnetism (Specific electron orbitals conditions) and phonons can be >> coupled under specific orbital conditions and one combination is shallow >> well ferromagnetism. Like the superconductor coupling, specific coupling >> can lead to coherent behavior as well in a ferromagnetic system. >> >> >> More needs tobe said but there is some new physics at work in the Manelas >> billet. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 1:56 PM >> *To:* Chris Zell; [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE >> >> >> Chris- >> >> >> >> I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a >> localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and >> potential energy in a resonant stable dynamic state. It is primarily >> thought to be an electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in >> the lattice—primarily the valence electrons. The nuclei oscillate around >> some mid position in the lattice and valence electrons change their >> orbital spin states reflecting the motion of the nuclei. >> >> >> >> Temperature of the crystal lattice is a measure of the amplitude of the >> nuclei special displacement around their mid position in the lattice. If >> the crystal constitutes a coherent QM system, then all nuclei vibrate with >> the same amplitude and the crystal is at a single temperature. If the >> amplitude (temperature) get to high, the crystal electronic bonds fail and >> the order of the crystalline coherent system is lost. >> >> >> >> Magnetic fields change the nature of the potential/kinetic energy >> sharing. A preferred direction in the crystal is created relative to the >> magnetic B field that exists within the crystalline coherent system. The >> orbital spin energy states of the valence electrons are modified. Large B >> fields can cause large changes in these orbital spin states. If there are >> resonances between a nuclear orbital spin state of the coherent system and >> an electronic orbital spin state, it would seem possible that spin energy >> may be swapped, changing nuclear potential energy into PHONIC energy of >> the crystalline coherent system. >> >> >> >> A variable B field induced by a variable ambient H magnetic field will >> create a universe of differing spin energy states each with a small >> difference in it angular momentum. If total angular momentum can be >> conserved, IMHO A TRANSITION WILL OCCUR. >> >> >> >> It may be also possible that the transition is reversible. In such case >> a reduction of the temperature—lower electron orbital energy—would be the >> result. (Such a reversal suggests a new concept of temperature, one which >> shares potential and kinetic energy between nuclear entities and electrons. >> ) >> >> >> >> Bob Cook >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for >> Windows 10 >> >> >> >> *From: *Chris Zell <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Monday, February 20, 2017 9:35 AM >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE >> >> >> >> I do recall Wingate Lambertson - a scientist/expert on cermet products. >> Odd semi-ceramic things he called “E-dams” that generated excess energy. I >> recall that he passed away before it could be fully developed. It all >> sounded like phonon derived energy. >> >> >> >> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 11:14 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE >> >> >> >> >> >> Chris Zell wrote: >> >> If I google “phonons as an energy source”, nothing in particular comes >> up. If we are identifying them as the likely source of excess energy >> within a barium/strontium ferrite structure, I would think that someone >> somewhere has thought about cohering them into useful energy. >> >> >> >> But if you google "Microelectromechanical systems" you will get 750,000 >> hits. >> >> >> >
