If the 2.8328 fermi mentioned in the paper is multiplied by the inverse of alpha, the fine structure constant (alpha =1/137.035999), then you get the radius of Randell Mills' TSO (Transition State Orbitsphere) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624
the radius of Randall Mills' TSO (Transition State Orbitsphere) is the bohr radius ( r = 0.52946 Angstroms) multiplied by the fine structure constant, alpha or: TSO radius = (0.52946 Angstroms) * (1/137.035999) = .00386298 angstroms = 386.298 fermi and 386.298/2.8328 = 136.366 which is close to the inverse of alpha (error of 1 part in 204) Randell Mills created GUTCP (the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics) and the TSO radius (also known as the particle production radius) is prominent throughout. This TSO radius has interesting properties where five energies using this radius exactly equate to the rest mass of the electron 510998.896 eV. To get the higher accuracy, the bohr radius without the reduced mass correction is used (a correction of 1 part in 1836) because at particle production, the positron (the anti-electron) orbits around the electron with each having the TSO radius. In other words, each has the same mass and therefore they orbit each other at the same radius around a common centerpoint. I describe those 5 energies starting on page 14 of a pdf that I created 7 years ago: http://zhydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/BLP-e-4-25-2016.pdf The particle production energies that all equal the electron rest mass of 510998.896 eV are: 1. Photon energy equation - based equation found in college physics textbook 2. Resonant energy (LC circuit equivalent) - based on equation found in college physics textbook 3. Electric potential energy equation - based on equation found in college physics textbook 4. Magnetic energy equation - this one is derived in GUTCP and is complicated but the result is a simple equation with integer exponents and standard physical constants (i.e. permeability of free space, plancks constant etc.). 5. Mass/Space time metric energy. This is *not* an energy and the derivation is in GUTCP and is complicated, but the result is a simple equation with integer exponents and standard physical constants (i.e. Gravitation constant, plancks constant etc.). The equations in the paper from sciencedirect that give 2.8328 fermi are similar to Mills's GUTCP equations which I try to summarize starting on page 86 of my pdf linked above. On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:07 PM H LV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 11:26 AM Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> HLV wrote: >> >> A simple argument that small hydrogen may exist >> >> Physics Letters B Volume 794, 10 July 2019, Pages 130-134 >> >> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624 >> >> >> Thanks for posting this. One curious observation is that there are a few >> other atoms besides hydrogen which may 'densify' : Presumably the dense >> version would provide anomalous heat. >> >> Quote "Our calculation also shows that other fully ionized “small-*Z* >> atoms” can form small-radius atoms... This would create atoms, where one >> electron is trapped on a small radius, effectively shielding one proton >> charge of the nucleus,.." >> >> Comment/question: Doesn't this finding open up the possibility for >> extracting anomalous heat from Helium? >> >> There could be secondary advantages to using Helium over H - due to >> inertness leading to ability to reuse the gas over and over ... >> >> Is there any indication of a catalyst for forming dense helium ?? >> > > > I don't know, but I have begun to wonder if frigorific radiation could > play a role in forming such atoms. > Also, for atoms below the ground state, I propose the term depressed atom. > This would compliment the term excited atom for atoms above the ground > state. > > Harry >
