In reply to Sean Logan's message of Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:09:28 -0700: Hi Sean,
Frankly I'm not sure what it means myself, but it can't be a coincidence, and is likely a clue to the nature of space-time, or at least the nature of the electron. "mean something" was both meant to be taken literally (i.e. it must be important) and also the number you calculated is the geometric mean between the classical electron radius and the Bohr radius, so to that extent it was a play on words. >Hello, > > Are you suggesting that long ago, in the time of Classical Physics, >someone performed the same simple algebraic calculation I just did, and >looked with consternation upon the result? "Hmm, you guys, this number >seems to be off. Let's multiply it by a correction factor. We'll call it >the Fine Structure Constant." > > Or, what *are* you saying? What do you mean, by, "mean something"? > > I was about to say, "I'm actually not that interested in electrons," but >I guess if you're making analog electronics, it may be wise to learn a >thing or two about the humble electron. > > > >@@@@@@@@ @@@@@ @@@ @@ @ @ @ @ @@ @@@ @@@@@ @@@@@@@@ @@@@@@@@@@@@@ >Sean P. Logan https://spaz.org/~magi >Fountain Giving Life >paco66551, gmail com Wave Articulation Matrices for >503-660-5616 Hyperdimensional Light If no one clicked on ads companies would stop paying for them. :)
