Jones wrote: > If your throw the switch off and let the caps charge for several > days (they will slowly charge) ... and then get the camera ready > and flip the switch, you can probably get the bulb to stay lit > long enough to get a convincing image.
Despite my natural level of skepticism, I think there might be something to this, if it isn't just a total fraud. The circuits are set up as AC, so I don't see how the caps would charge. In any case, letting the thing charge up over time would be just as fraudulent, IMHO, as running a hidden wire under the base. After all, they are claiming continuous power. > But as stated elsewhere, IF this were instead to be an accurate > portrayal of the situation without the time-charge phenomena > (doubtful) then it is conceivable that b-aether is somehow > involved as this is NOT capturing alpha radiation (even the glass > vial would block the alphas) and the gammas are too high in > frequency to be rectified normally (not to mention in the > microwatt category of energy) All true, except that as I understand how this is supposed to work, the beta decay releases large amounts of energy as magnetic flux. The circuit is set up to make the the beta decay magnetic fields, which would normally be random, resonate with the LC circuit. Actual exposure of the coil to alpha or gamma radiation is therefore not required. Who knows, maybe it's not 2good-2b-true. Do you have any reason to believe these guys are not on the up-and-up? M. _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
