>From 1911 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1911.0046
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:34 PM Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> wrote: > In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Mon, 12 Dec 2022 20:04:21 > -0600: > Hi Andrew, > > I think this one is the original: > > https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-019-1447-1 > > > from which I think https://www.space.com/planets-affect-solar-cycle.html > is derived. > > The latter in plain English. > > > >Robin, > > > >Do you have a link for this? I proposed something similar at MIT about 40 > >years ago. I looked at the direct relationships and many resonances but > >could not find one. I did not have time (could not rationalize taking the > >time) to look at the accelerations (as in tidal influences). It certainly > >looked as if there should be some correlations. > > > >Andrew > >_ _ _ > > > >On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 4:41 PM Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> There have been a number of papers recently on the correlation between > >> planetary motion and the sunspot cycle, some > >> without an explanation of the mechanism. > >> > >> My take on the matter is this. Motion of the Sun about the barycenter of > >> the solar system causes the solar plasma to > >> "slosh" as would water in a bucket if you wobble the bucket. If you get > >> the frequency right then the water in the bucket > >> will rotate. In the case of the Sun, the resulting rotation is one and > the > >> same as the rotation of the Sun about it's > >> axis. This rotation of the plasma creates the solar magnetic field. The > >> whole thing is completely causal. Ergo changes > >> in planetary positions, produce equivalent changes in the motion of the > >> Sun, which in turn alter the plasma flow, which > >> in turn alters its magnetic field. > >> Cloud storage:- > >> > >> Unsafe, Slow, Expensive > >> > >> ...pick any three. > >> > >> > Cloud storage:- > > Unsafe, Slow, Expensive > > ...pick any three. > >
