You're kidding, right? On Wed, Jan 4, 2023, 8:40 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote:
> The western Oligarchs got a free CoV-19 check of about 1000'000'000'000 $ > just by brain damaging population manipulation through all news channels. > > > The US military (free masons) were the driving force behind the military > gain of research (Fort Detrick). The military spin off Moderna submitted > the first CoV-19 spike patent 2016 (hidden by national security) so the > true war here was against the population. > > > The eastern Oligarchs (including most Israel ones that had no Pfizer > shares) did ask for a compensation and it was obvious to hunt the fat goose > right over the boarder.... > > > The rest has been caused by Vodka and the jet-sex live of Russian generals > that meant nukes are cocks to help force the rape.... > > > So its all a game. 2 RNA shots and you will die 15% earlier than expected > - in average. So enjoy your live and hope the CoV-19 war is over. > > > > For the Americans among the list- The real US death count from CoV-19 is > just 5% of the official figures. If you analyses the official US mortality > data even this seems to be to high after the first 2020 wave. So stay off > any boosters if you want to enjoy your live and buy some drugs like > Ivermectin to early stop an infection. Prepare yourself with V-D3 > (5000IU/day) +K2 200ug). It's all about sun the easier way to get it. A > Swedish study did show that enough sun prolongates your live by 30% > compared to the cave mans... > > > J.W. > > > On 04.01.2023 17:15, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > > You are pointing out more reasons why Putin/Russia feel provoked when you > say things like - "Ukraine has almost twice the U reserves as the USA as > well as the original processing plants going back to the cold war ..." - > Supposedly from his point-of-view -> Ukraine and West were not going to > negiotate with him about such things and so was forced to take action. > > ------ Original Message ------ From: "Jones Beene" <jone...@pacbell.net> > <jone...@pacbell.net> To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > <vortex-l@eskimo.com> <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, 4 Jan, 23 At > 13:48 Subject: Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year > There is another point of view which recognizes that Ukraine never trusted > Russia (duh, who does?) ... going back through history - and therefore > never gave up all of their nukes - treaty or no. > They most likely kept smaller suitcase or artillery devices which would > have been easier to hide. > This would not have been difficult to do in that time frame. The > Ukrainians are not so stupid as to trust Russia and before Zelenskyy they > were corrupt so another motivation could have been financial gain. At any > rate they would surely have kept enough fissile material to serve as a > deterrent, but also --- some or all of that material may be in private > hands maybe in a neighboring country such as Poland. > Putin is probably aware of this. After all he is the master spy. His > bluster is directed at NATO. > Ukraine has almost twice the U reserves as the USA as well as the original > processing plants going back to the cold war when there were several > "secret cities" scattered around the Donbas which may explain why that area > is the center of attention of the Wagner group ... which has likely been > promised billions of Euros to retrieve the material. > If there was NOT such a deterrent out there in the hands of the Ukrainians > - they would already have been toast by now. > Terry Blanton wrote: > Regretfully, I agree. > ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > > Ukraine was not supposed to have nukes by earlier agreements with Russia, > hence Ukraine wanted to join NATO to get access to nukes - and that was > seen as breaking agreements with Russia hence one of the reasons for > Putin's invasion - i.e deemed Russia was provoked. If Ukraine secretly has > nukes then they broke agreement much earlier than recognised > > ------ Original Message ------ From: "bobcook39...@hotmail.com" < > bobcook39...@hotmail.com> To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, 4 Jan, 23 At 00:09 Subject: RE: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous > New Year > > I AGREE WITH JONES; Ukraine sent drones deep into Russia to remind Putin > that they are not the onley onrs with tactical nucs. MAD is alive ane still > is working IMHO/ > > I see a trues in the new YEAR WITH Ukraine 95 % WHOLE—MAYBE AN OLD ww2 > CRUSIER AS A CONSOLATION PRIZE FOR THE RUSSIAN NAVY. > > FRC > > --------------------- > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > *From: *Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> *Sent: *Saturday, December 31, > 2022 5:39 PM *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An > ominous New Year > > Yes I remember seeing some of this years ago. > > We have to remember that Ukraine was just as corrupt as Russia in the > recent past. > > The new twist is that the suitcase devices were actually constructed in > Ukraine decades ago ... as were other nukes in the Soviet arsenal years > ago. The Russian equivalent to Oak Ridge is actually n Ukraine. > > The problem now being this - are some of the missing devices in the hands > of non-Zelenskyy Ukrainians or ex patriots who may have an agenda which is > not aligned with NATO/USA ?? > > This mystery may explain why Putin has not used a major asset > > Terry Blanton wrote: > > The missing suitcase nukes hidden in cities in the US is not a new story. > I'm sure it was around in the 90s after the collapse of the SU. If NEST > hasn't found them by now, well... > > Jones Beene wrote: > > Can this upcoming year, 2023, possibly be Happy for most of us ? > > Consider this: the situation in Ukraine has cast a dark shadow over > everything. Basically, Russia cannot win, nor can they fully lose... so > long as a nuclear option exists. > > Most military experts rule out that option, but they have overlooked one > hidden possibility which is now emerging (from the all but forgotten Cold > War) - and now we see this predicament turning up in the fringe news. See > the video below on the 250 so-called "suitcase nukes" that we have lost > track of... > > It is sad to think that part of our present predicament is related to > control of energy resources, which is a situation that LENR would arguably > have mollified or eliminated, if the technology had been adequately > researched back in the early 1990s > > The Balance of Power, so to speak, would have been different in a world > with adequate energy beyond fossil fuels... but of course that conclusion > assumes many things... > > Speaking of related unproved assumptions which would change things in > hidden ways... check out this video which turned up today. There are > surprising ramifications given that a preexisting batch of small nukes may > have already been planted.., maybe even in DC > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS_7eZVt854 > > If there are optimists out there on Volandia let me add:i > > -- Happy New Year !!! > > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
