Here is an annoying article about cold fusion. I guess any publicity is good publicity, but it is annoying:
https://www.popsci.com/science/cold-fusion-low-energy-nuclear-reaction/ "Cold fusion is making a scientific comeback A US agency is funding low-energy nuclear reactions to the tune of $10 million. . . ." I cannot post a message at the website without registering, so I sent my standard response to the author: raorr...@gmail.com You wrote: "Fleischmann and Pons’ fatal flaw—that their results could not be replicated . . ." That is incorrect. Within a year Fleischmann and Pons were replicated in 92 major laboratories, listed here: https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/WillFGgroupsrepo.pdf By the mid-1990s, over 180 laboratories reported replications. These replications were published in mainstream, peer-reviewed journals. I suggest you review this literature before commenting on this subject. See: https://lenr-canr.org/