In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 26 Oct 2026 18:03:10 +0100:
Hi Jürg,

I agree humidity is also important, which is why large coastal cities near an 
open body of water may be most at risk.
Also while 50C is survivable with dry air, plenty of liquids, and good aircon, 
60-70C on a humid day with no aircon
isn't, especially if the water coming out of the cold water tap has the same 
temperature as the water coming out of the
hot tap.

....perfect storm.


[snip]
>Hi Robin
>
>If you combine air condition with solar energy -  a perfect match - then 
>the risk is very low especially if you have a redundant system.
>
> > 2 billion people will be displaced when the sea level is +4 meters 
>factually this means 10 meters if you add stronger storm waves.
>
>In Arabia you live with 50C day time T since quite a long time. But its 
>not supportable for Nordic genotype humans...
>
>I personally enjoy T up to 35C and also up to 40 is no real problem. But 
>my wive panics already at 30C. It is also a matter of humidity 30C with 
>90% humidity is more demanding that 36 with 30%.
>
>
>J.W.
>
>On 25/10/2026 20:28, Robin wrote:
>> In reply to  Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 25 Oct 2026 13:02:29 +0100:
>> Hi Jürg,
>>
>> I think heatstroke will be a far more serious problem than sea level rise. 
>> Sea level rise is slow and communities will
>> move out of the way (piecemeal). However as the average temperature anomaly 
>> increases so does the chance of extremely
>> hot days. This is worse in cities, which act as heat islands. Normally 
>> people keep cool with fans and airconditioners,
>> but the electrical distribution system also has heat related weaknesses as 
>> demonstrated by the recent power grid
>> collapse in Spain.
>> On such an extremely hot day, the chances of a power grid failure are also 
>> maximized. It's a "perfect storm".
>> Just when it is most needed, the power grid fails, resulting in millions of 
>> people dying in the city in one day.
>> Just imagine trying to bury millions of bodies all at once. It's essentially 
>> an impossible task. The city will just be
>> abandoned by anyone who survives. Later looters may go back to ransack the 
>> place.
>>
>> This will not just happen in one city. As the temperature anomaly continues 
>> to worsen the number of cities where this
>> happens will increase. After the first, you may see people all over the 
>> world abandoning the cities altogether, and
>> heading for the countryside, which won't help because small towns will grow 
>> into cities again.
>>
>> Our only real hope is to develop a source of clean energy that is not based 
>> on fossil fuels before it is too late.
>> [snip]
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/ELE.html
>>
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/ELE.html

Reply via email to