Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Hey, this sounds very good!
I would say not bad so far.
Some of the other oddities about their results -- like, 2.4 mm rods work and 3 mm rods don't -- are also encouraging: that sort of observation could easily make sense in the context of a "real" result . . .
Yes indeed.
Naudin's entertaining but his results always seem a little too facile for my tastes -- that, plus the fact that in at least one instance he apparently added in the cooling-time energy twice, which (surprise!) pushed the apparent results 'way over unity.
Mizuno talked him out of that. They have spent a lot of time consulting and I gather Naudin's results are now better, although I confess I have not looked at recent results closely.
- Jed
