Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:32:35
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What
I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a
3 dimensional universe.
There's a nonsequitor if ever I head one.
Not if you had been following the thread.
I think that the universe is more complicated
John E W Keeley believed that
there were three subunits that made up the atom, Dale Pond created an
excellent graphic showing three spheres dancing around one another, It
can be seen at http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html#animatedtriplet
...and both chose the number three because we live in a 3
dimensional universe.
Did anyone look at Dale Pond's graphic on SVPVRIL? He built a machine
based on Keeley's design for the Dynasphere, and named it Atlin. He says
that it works on the Strong Force, by love.. Women like it, that would
be reason enough to get one. Dale has published a book, which is all I
can afford...to be continued.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
