Fred
They '"decelerate it" by increasing the magnetic field of the
solenoids don't they, Jones? Any device in rotation at a
constant angular speed has a dv/dt = v^2/r acceleration because
of the constant change of direction of the tangential velocity
vector.
This raises an interesting point. Perhaps what is happening in
these later experiments is that the "graviton" is more similar to
a real photon than we have realized previously, and that there is
a recirculating flux of these which is somewhat more real than
virtual - in the sense that certain real phenomena in 3-space can
interact with that flux.
Curiously - WRT to the recent ESA group experiment, this might
imply that only gravity-enhancement (as opposed to anti-gravity)
is usable with superconducting technology - which acts somewhat
like a "sail" against the flux at the interface. However the
"return interface" may exist in yet another and more-deeply
enfolded fractal (in the original sense of "factional dimension").
This would serve to denigrate the Podkletnov work, or course. Of
the 250 successful experiments of the ESA group - were none of
them showing an anti-gravity effect (as opposed to enhanced
gravity)? I had been thinking that it depended on the direction of
spin but I can't find that reference now.
Jones
BTW if you have ever experienced an animated fractal "journey"
such as the one on the iMax screen ... it gives a visceral
appreciation for traveling into another dimension in which there
is a seemingly preferred vector but no real linearity or
"signposts". It is little wonder that toakmaks and such are
difficult to control; and the same will likely be true with
gravity control.
- Re: Electrogravity, "jerk" and "jounce&qu... Jones Beene
-