Here it is. > > [Original Message] > From: Frederick Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Date: 4/13/2006 5:53:27 PM > Subject: Re: Does A Voltage Alter The Ether? > > If high voltage and energy density between capacitor plates > "polarizes" the vacuum enough to create "wormholes": Why not? > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Frederick Sparber wrote: > >> This primer implies that the ether will squish out, and require more >> potential V to store more energy which will squish out more ether,and >> so on if coefficient K keeps dropping ? > E.W. Davis and Hal Puthoff say:
http://www.earthtech.org/publications/davis_STAIF_conference_1.pdf "To squeeze, one acts on a (complex) state using a squeeze operator, S( ), for a single quantized harmonic oscillator: S( ) = exp[½( a2 *a2)] (note: * signifies the complex conjugate of ). The state = rei determines the size of the squeezing, where r is the amplitude (giving a measure of the mean photon number in ) and is the phase of squeezing. The squeezed vacuum is therefore defined as: = S( ) vac . Calculating the uncertainties A and B with respect to the squeezed vacuum gives A = ½exp(r) and B = ½exp( r); therefore B is squeezed and A is stretched. Thus S( ) reduces the uncertainty in B and increases that in A while maintaining the minimized uncertainty product. The act of squeezing transforms the phase space circular noise profile characteristic of the vacuum into an ellipse, whose semimajor and semiminor axes are given by A and B, respectively. This applies to coherent states in general, and the usual vacuum is also a coherent state with eigenvalue zero. As this ellipse rotates about the origin with angular frequency , these unequal quadrature uncertainties manifest themselves in the oscillator energy by periodic occurrences, which are separated by one quarter cycle, of both smaller and larger fluctuations compared to the unsqueezed vacuum.? "If one squeezes the vacuum, i.e., if one puts vacuum rather than laser light into the input port of a squeezing device, then one gets at the output an electromagnetic field with weaker fluctuations and thus less energy density than the vacuum at locations where cos2 (t z/c) 1 and sin2 (t z/c) << 1; but with greater fluctuations and thus greater energy density than the vacuum at locations where cos2 (t z/c) << 1 and sin2 (t z/c) 1 (Caves, 1981; Morris and Thorne, 1988). Since the vacuum is defined to have vanishing energy density, any region with less energy density than the vacuum actually has a negative (renormalized) expectation value for the energy density. Therefore, a squeezed vacuum state consists of a traveling electromagnetic wave that oscillates back and forth between negative energy density and positive energy density, but has positive time-averaged energy density." In the words of Festus Hagan, "Don't you see"? :-) Fred
