|
Michel wrote..
>Ah OK Fred, I thought you were talking about conventional
chemistry/physics
>for once (should have known better ;) Howdy Michel.. Conventional physics/ chemistry ?? There ain't no such thing as
we are beginning to discover !!
Once had the best welder worked in our shop. You could take a set of
drawings to him ..he wouldn't study them until you described it's purpose. Once
he knew it's use, he could figure out the drawings and how to make it.
Jones' remark in "A blast in Ohio" thread started me thinking.
Perhaps scientific discover eludes the brightest in favor of the intuitive,
that being someone that looks at a solar flare or a hurricane and ponders the
question.. What was the purpose.. rather than..how was it made ??
In the grand scheme of things we must remember we exist in a seething
cauldron of energy bursting at the seams. In the universe we have checks and
balances to keep everything from flying out of control. A closer study indicates
we have both chaos and order.. a paradox.. until we consider we are actually
viewing " ordered chaos" rather than "order out of chaos".
Fred has this remarkble ability to view both perspectives. In his
mind, it must be like holding a spitting wildcat in each hand to keep
the two separate.
Richard
|
- Re: EONIUM-HERE (H3O*) Powered Engines RC Macaulay
- Re: EONIUM-HERE (H3O*) Powered Engines Michel Jullian
- Re: EONIUM-HERE (H3O*) Powered Engines Frederick Sparber
- Spargone Powered Engine Jones Beene
- Re: EONIUM-HERE (H3O*) Powered Engines Grimer
- Re: EONIUM-HERE (H3O*) Powered Engines Frederick Sparber
- Re: EONIUM-HERE (H3O*) Powered Engines Michel Jullian

