No you misunderstand:
And enough "Special-K" in a bottle to get a kilowatt
will have a coulomb of negative charge setting off
Jovian Thunderbolts wrt either. :-)
The hydino hydride has only a net transitory charge until that
short time that it gets taken into the orbit of the potassium ion
in the oceans - which it neutralizes into Special-K if the
shrinkage of the hydrino is high enough - but either of which (gas
or solid) is an UNCHARGED species.
Mills has vials of this stuff for demonstration (the potassium
therein has only the slightly shrunken hydrinos, not the very high
shrinkage variety). Thus it has not gasified. It has zero net
charge and very unusual NMR properties. This is important to know.
It becomes Special-K (Argon) only nearer to the maximum shrinkage
(in my original post) - although it seems that Robin is suggesting
that a peak at 3672 would equate to a shrinkage level of 16-17 -
which just happens to be the level at which hydrinohydride
formation enthalpy is at a maximum.
That is another reason why this is all fitting together rather
nicely. That is because in this alternative view - the forming of
Hy(1/16) would take place in the solar corona - not here. Only the
substitution happens here.
This does not mean that it is an 'either/or' situation in some of
these anecdotal accounts - not that more than one modality cannot
be happening in some of the fringe accounts. But they are always
open to fraud and hearsay.
However, my focus (trying to sound rather pompous today) is on
finding *real proof,* and mainstream science has given us real
proof of "efficient radiation" in Argon. Everyone seems to be
glossing over this important detail. It is critical to my
argument.
Everything in the other accounts, like the Joe Cell is anecdotal
at best... and fully-loaded Aussies pouring 100 proof alcohol into
balloons and Joe Cells is better left to happy-hour speculation.
....Not that there's anything wrong with happy hour....
Jones
