Mills has been investigating the hydrino for 17 years now, and it
is somewhat presumptuous to try to second-guess him on any of
those details -as no one publishes "all" they know. And Mills is a
recognized genius who must know more than what he divulges - but
in CQM, he may have made many remarkable advances, together with a
few errors.
He may have more data stashed away, but from what he has released
publicly there are strong alternatives to a few of his
conclusions, even alternative which fit into the base-CQM theory -
sort-of.... And having never been restrained in the past from
being an old-fool who is presumptuous enough to spit-in-the-eye of
the recognized authorities, when there are obviously in error <g>
... here goes another foray into creating a minority-of-minorities
viewpoint. Damn the torpedoes....
In the last few years, it appears that Mills has taken a fancy to
the hydrino hydride (especially as his marketing-salvation in the
eyes of investors, since he cannot publicly demonstrate robust OU)
which will be designated as (Hy-) , and particularly to the
(Hy-)compounds - the HHCs. These would indeed be very valuable -
for batteries, for instance - if they were not already free (and
you knew where to look).
According to Mills, this (Hy-) is a stable ion (in most cases more
stable than any atom) which, crazy as it sounds, has an extra
electron dangling onto it. I do not like this image - and am
almost certain that it is incorrect. Electrons have a very strong
propensity - almost an ultimatum in nature - to be *paired* as
equals. I think he got this model of unequal pairing very wrong,
and that this basic error has poisoned his entire HHC thinking.
Here is what he says: (along with a pic of the HHCs if you want to
see something tangible)
http://www.blacklightpower.com/applications.shtml
"The lower-energy atomic hydrogen product of the BlackLight
Process reacts with an electron to form a hydride ion, which
further reacts with elements other than hydrogen to form novel
proprietary compounds called hydrino hydride compounds (HHCs).
BlackLight is developing the vast class of proprietary chemical
compounds formed via the BlackLight Process. Test results indicate
that the properties of HHCs are rich in diversity due to their
extraordinary binding energy (i.e., the energy required to remove
an electron which determines the chemical reactivity and
properties). "
At any rate, the "alternative viewpoint" presented herein - is
aimed mainly only that segment of hydrinos which is primordial,
solar-derived, and of very large "shrinkage". - i.e. these are
solar (cosmic) hydrinos of mated paired electrons, in very compact
orbitals. This accounts for probably 99.99+ % of all hydrinos in
the big picture, and this "alternative viewpoint" has advantages -
none of which has been, or can be, anticipated by Mills - since he
is wed to this indefensible viewpoint of unequal pairing.
I say "solar" in derivation to differentiate the highly shrunken
variety from the kind which Mills produces in experiments. This
kind of hydrino may have been created in the big-bang, or an Arp
sequential little-bang, or wherever... but the main point is that
creation of them require massive energy together with massive
gravity, and at the same instant in formative time, in order to
create and stabilize in this highly shrunken state. All but
impossible to do on earth.
BLP cannot, under any circumstances except using the fiction of
"auto-catalysis", produce these highly shrunken variety in a
vacuum, as it takes way too much energy input+pressure ... yet
Mills may have seen them, as they are ubiquitous, and he thinks
they came from his experiment. Forgivable error, except for the
secondary invention of "auto-catalysis" to shoehorn everything
together.
The compact variety did not derive from any earthly experiment.
They are primordial, and the whole idea of "auto-catalysis" is a
fabulous-fable, so to speak. Consider instead that these highly
shrunken (Hy-) are created cosmologically and ARE the major part
of what we call "dark matter" and are ubiquitous. Just how
"ubiquitous" remains to be seen.
The question on every careful observer's lips then is: How can
they NOT express a negative charge, naturally ?
That should be quite obvious to anyone who has studied Hotson's
work and is willing to extend that basic idea of the BEC-epo field
to include the interfacial layer of the aether. The (Hy-) is
polarizing the epo field at the interface (to reciprocal space),
which is effectively neutralizing the negative charge in our
3-space. This particular level of aether interface is purely a
matter of geometry - and exists at the far-sub-angstrom. In Frank
Grimer's hierarchy, it would be called the gamma-aether, most
likely.
The negative charge is there - just hidden - and it is always
derived initially from equally paired electrons in very tight
orbitals (n greater than 1/8 or so). Only at a certain tiny
dimension will the neutralizing effect of epo polarization set
in - so the slightly shrunken variety which Mills makes in his lab
are charged ions - but not the cosmic variety.
This viewpoint can explain, among other things, how this species
gets into atoms undetected, and why it stays there. Note that for
purposes of IP, these atoms with the "neutralized" solar hydrinos
(Hy-Psx) are not HHCs as Mills defines them.
BTW in this tentative designation of: (Hy-Psx) - the
hydrinohydride with paired electrons and of approximately n=1/8
down to 1/17 shrinkage- the Ps is positronium in the form of a
neutralizing cage - most likely a tetrahedron of 4 "interfacial"
Ps, which are not quite virtual and not quite real. In actuality
it could be a "cage" of 12, or twenty, or 60 or more formerly
"virtual" Ps atoms, quien sabe? Since the epo in a BEC state
normally, the effective number is infinite - or just one
(depending on semantics)
Now back to the issue of "Special-K" and the possibility of a
heavy Argon species, which is basically 39-potassium gasified by
the capture of a solar (Hy-Psx) in which the hydrino is a resonant
"fit" and stays put. In a previous posting, the opinion was
expressed that the electron complement is 20 (and Robin v S. sees
this differently, for different reasons) but with eight in the
outer orbital- the (Hy-Psx) modifying the entire k-shell and
"deflating" the former-K-atom, so that the 8+8 outer electrons are
now in identical orbits as if it were an argon atom with a very
strange interior. This creates secondary problems, but that is why
the wild-hairs on vortex, like the Energizer wild-hare,
"keep-going-and-going".
OK admittedly not there yet... but there is some small
satisfaction from another foray into formulating a coherent
minority-of-minorities viewpoint, where a few things fit more
elegantly than in the minority-prototype, which is CQM - let's
just say that it is a meme with a half-life of at least a few
hours.
This calls for a cafe-latte-grande.
Jones
