Dear Vorts (of a sort),

Not enough energy to catch up with the prolific Jed, but here is an idea
for another path to Challenge victory:


According to A STUDENT'S GUIDE TO COLD FUSION, by Edmund Storms
http://www.lenr-canr.org/StudentsGuide.htm
-----
Evidence for iron production during arcing between carbon electrodes under
H2O has been reported [16, 165-167]. This method seems to be easily
reproduced. Palladium and gold cathodes also showed excessive iron after
electrolysis in light water [168, 169].

[16] Sundaresan, R. and J. Bockris, Anomalous Reactions During Arcing
Between Carbon Rods in Water. Fusion Technol., 1994. 26: p. 261.
[168] Ohmori, T. and M. Enyo, Iron Formation in Gold and Palladium
Cathodes. J. New Energy, 1996. 1(1): p. 15.
-----


My assumption (!) or hope is that transmutation using the arcing method is
much faster than any results that occur via electrolysis.

But I'm also assuming (ass u me) that the transmutation researchers simply
tested their resulting "iron" magnetically by waving a permanent magnet
over the residue to see if anything therein responded ferromagnetically
(though nickel and cobalt also exhibit ferromagnetism).  That's what I
seem to recall from an old issue of "Infinite Energy".

BUT! -- Just to show how problematic that test is, here is an
not-so-recent science news item:


-----
More Magnets, Please    

Only metals can become magnetic, right? Introducing buckyballs that may
undo our thinking on yet another scientific principle
By Robert Kunzig

DISCOVER Vol. 23 No. 12 | December 2002

Tatiana Makarova makes are tiny black cylinders, a tenth of an inch long.
If they weren't so small, you might mistake them for ordinary refrigerator
magnets. But the stuff they are made from is not ordinary iron: It costs
$100 a gram. In fact, Makarova handles that precious black powder in a
transparent "glove box"—the kind of thing a biologist might use to contain
a virus—precisely because she doesn't want it getting contaminated by some
speck of iron-laden dust in her lab. Magnetic iron would not be news. What
Makarova has discovered is magnetic carbon.

Only four elements in the periodic table—iron, cobalt, nickel, and
gadolinium—are naturally ferromagnetic at room temperature, meaning they
can be permanently magnetized by exposure to a magnetic field. But the
search for nonmetallic magnets—which could be light, cheap, maybe even
transparent—has lately become something of a cottage industry. A decade
ago, a Japanese lab isolated a metal-free organic compound that became
permanently magnetized at a fraction of a degree above absolute zero.
Makarova, a Russian physicist working at Umeå University in Sweden, has
now found a way to make magnets of pure carbon—to be precise, of
buckyballs, the soccer-ball-shaped molecules that consist of 60 carbon
atoms each. Her magnets are extremely weak -— "They won't stick to your
refrigerator," she says —- but they do work at room temperature. That's an
essential quality if they are ever going to have any practical applications.

http://www.discover.com/issues/dec-02/features/featmagnet/
-----


As vortians are no doubt aware, fullerenes (originally known as
buckminsterfullerenes; the buckyball, the third known natural form of pure
carbon after diamond and graphite) is one of the components of soot, soot
from burning carbon like from candles -- or from carbon arc lamps.

Maybe if the cold fusioneers weren't looking so hard for transmutations
they would have discovered Makarova's magnetic carbon years before she
did.  At least they can produce a version more easily:  Makarova has to
process her buckyballs into a polymer using pressure of a million pounds
per square inch at a temperature of more than 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit
(forgive the non-SI units).  So if your "iron" instead turns out to be
magnetic buckyballs you've got yourself a potentially useful patent right
there.

At any rate, instead assuming actual iron, for our purposes I recommend
that the residue be tested for the presence of iron, tested using multiple
sensitive "iron-clad" chemical tests.  No need to bring in a mass
spectrometer unless JREF insists.

Unfortunately -- as I explained to Jed in a private email -- any evidence
of "transmutation" introduces a problem:  The counter-claim that the new
elements were already somewhere present in the experimental apparatus
before the experiment started.  So we have to introduce additional control
experimental set-ups that can be examined, and to have a reasonable number
of experiments and controls we have to prepare at least six experimental
set-ups beforehand, choosing by chance which three of the six to run. If
the results are positive and consistent, the chance that only the three
"rigged" experimental setups were chosen is the combination of six things,
taken three at a time; C(6,3) = 20.  One chance in 20.

If you want an even more conclusive result, try more experimental set-ups:
 C(8,4) = 70; C(10,5) = 252.  I'd wager that if you pass the preliminary
testing phase JREF will insist on 10 set-ups.

That's assuming that indeed, "This method seems to be easily reproduced."
 We might lower our expectations to allow one of five run experiments to
fail, which changes the numbers but I've forgotten exactly how right now.

For experimental details, preparation and early testing, get help from
Sundaresan AND Bockris if you can.  The whole set-up MUST be proved to
work consistently BEFORE you agree to be tested by JREF.

Or if instead the "iron" turns out to be magnetic buckyballs, you have a
potentially valuable patent.

-----

I also suggested to Jed doing a demo using the so-called "Reifenschweiler
Effect" (http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Reifenschwreducedrad.pdf) but he
said it had never been reproduced.  If both that and the above are ruled
out and no one has a better idea then someone will have to do things the
hard way:  Balance reproducibility, min/avg/max time for effect, signal
strength, control methods and a dozen other aspects of cold fusion
research in order to mount a test for the Challenge.  Unfortunately, not
myself being a scientist I can't be of any help.

But I remain convinced that someone can do it.

-Walter


Reply via email to