Hi Noel,
Thanks for the update. It seems that your personal experience with
Meyer was a huge disappointment, and with suspicion of a scam, but
also some evidence of a potential energy anomaly, which fits-in
with what others have said.
One hopes that now, with additional information from others, and
by focusing on the small grain of truth which Meyer may have
serendipitously discovered, but was unable to advance due to his
paranoia or other mental defects, that we can still use that work
to advance a compound or hybrid technique - if of course there
ever was anything to it.
What was the use of the "central Electrode" in the browns gas
unit ?? I seem to have missed that point?
In the Brown's Gas Cell geometry, which is using a stack of
stainless plates instead of concentric tubes, only the end plates
are actively charged from the power supply itself, and all of the
numerous central "neutral plates" between the two end plates, are
(nominally) uncharged and insulated. If there is excess energy, it
is coming from these plates most likely.
But the neutral plates do get an effective capacitance-charge
inductively with an equally divided voltage drop. The Joe-Cell
does something similar, using only two or three neutral tubes,
instead of 10 or more plates. It is probably NOT as efficient as
the Brown's gas setup, due to lower Helmholtz surface area - as a
basic design parameter. However, the key feature of the J.C. , and
its big advantage over the others in practice, seems to be in the
use of "preconditioned" or charged water.
If you watch the Steven's videos, he shows a naive way to charge,
but it is far from optimum, according to others who have taken it
to the next level. The optimum charge would start with pure water
and be an overnight connection to a 12 v. battery-charger. At
first, almost no current would pass but after 10-12 hours, you may
have added maybe a net kilowatt per liter or less to the "fuel"
which was formerly pure water. At least this is the way it is
being presented. No detectable gas is emitted during charging and
little or no water loss. There is substantial discoloration and
froth. The charging cell can be the same unit as the engine cell,
but it is more convenient to have them separate and generally the
charging cell has more spacing between tubes.
If this charged water has been converted into some kind of a
liquid ultra-capacitor, then that would be the easiest explanation
for what is going on.
Then there is the hydrino, orgone, helionon, muonium, ... etc...
but the simplest explanation may be the best - a liquid
ultracapacitor
Jones
- Re: Water-based fuel for the ICE Jones Beene
-
