Here in the transit industry, we know our PFs for all our loads; however, I can't convince them that they do not have to increase their conductor sized to meet this NFPA requirement. Besides, we're not even subject to the NFPA. Because we're talking hundreds of miles of 750 kcm Cu conductors here, we're talking about millions of wasted $$. 
 
<rant over> 

<><><><><><>

For the record, Michel is right in that the reactive power wants to return to the load via the transmission system and contributes to conductor heating.

Our client wants to raise the conductor diameters over the initial design and cites the NFPA. However, our traction power engineers argue that a 20% safety factor inherent in the design is more than enough. The NFPA is very conservative in conductor heating issues.

Turns out the engineers have already proposed adding negative VAR devices over larger copper (PF correcting capacitors).

Terry
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com

Reply via email to