I said why a filter, which I am not too lazy to setup (I have about 20 of those), wasn't nearly as good as a prefix for a mailing list. This is standard mailing list practice which I am not going to further waste my time to explain to you. REs and FWs getting put in front of the prefix are standard too.
Note Bill had been planning to do this for quite some time as he told us. Is this OK with you or do you really want to start a war on the topic? Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Steck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 7:05 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Put a [Vo] tag in the message Subject line > Will all due respect Bill, this is a silly thing to waste time on just > because someone is too lazy to set up a simple filter on the address. As > soon as you reply a RE: or FW: gets put in front of it... doh! > > Just my 2 cents. 8^( > > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Beaty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 5:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Vo]: Put a [Vo] tag in the message Subject line > > > > Test. Does this work? > > > (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) > William J. Beaty http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] UW Chem Dept, Bagley Hall RM74 > 206-543-6195 Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700 >
