I wonder about Paul Brown. He warned everyone he was being threatened, discontinued his work - then re-started it later and died in an "accident" soon after.
If tens of thousands die for oil in war, should inventors be off limits? Most of us have enough sense to avoid walking thru crime ridden neighborhoods or carefully walk across busy streets. Do we act the same way about "disruptive technology"? If the NSA monitors "disruptive technology", are we to trust them as regards the definition of what disruptive means? Does it concern terrorism - or things that wreck financial markets by replacing oil? Do we get to openly debate the issue? Does Congress? Do various researchers remain alive as long as they fail to enter the popular realm of credibility? Can they be neutralized by ridicule and rank disbelief? -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:11 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Re: Stan Meyer - Autopsy Report Oops, meant to say- ...nor was Gene Mallove murdered as part of a conspiracy. Of course he was murdered. Meyer was not even murdered. There was no big conspiracy to silence the enemies of 'Big Oil' in either case - at least there is no evidence of such.
