IF YOU PLEASE
Will any or all VO let us know the general and-or specific energy [energies] of-for-with:
WATER: electrolytic decomposition ... volts, currents... h as gas ...h2 as gas ...o as gas --o2 as gas.
and PLEASE .....
permit some party to arrive at some general non ambiguous ....common term [terms] of and for:::
H
H2
O
O2
-----------------
electrolytic parameters... current, temperature.
Time .... electrode types
[leave us not forget M Schwartz]
.............
can ANY Vorta
please try to arrive at some common terms????
Or is-are this tooooo rough??
THANK
On 6/15/06, john herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
General comment regarding aqueous electrolyte based cold fusion experiments:NB: With aqueous electrolyte based cold fusion experiments electric circuit causes power to be applied to electrodes in a reaction cell.Questions and Comments = QCQC: Can someone let us know, in general, the values of votage and current or ranges for these measures?QC: In how many cases do we find H and O produced?QC: Can anyone let us know the MEASURED amounts of H and O?QC: How are the measures arrived at....? Or are the amounts of H and O "calculated?" and not measured?QC: If measured are there real world empirical values for the energy conveyed by the H and O ?QC: Have the volumes of H and O been conveyed to fuel cells and-or have the volumes of H and O been combusted to yield real world thermal information....?As opposed to the CALCULATED energy that MIGHT be available if one was to exploit H and O ??--------QC: Can anyone post any of this information?NB: Without this information investigators can only present part of the "picture" regardingInput ------> VS ----> Output ---> of and for CF.Please let all of know of the holes in the Question.....QC: Can this question be asked in some form that is more accurate or effective or both?Thank to you,JHnn
On 6/14/06, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> "In 1902, in an attempt at a chemical conception of the Aether,
> he put forward an incorrect hypothesis that there existed two
> inert chemical elements of lesser atomic weight than hydrogen.
Maybe ... but lest we be too hasty with the "incorrect" part...
there is also "helionon" of Walter Russell ... and to look for
mainstream guidance, well the "official" explanation for the lines
is laughable, right ? Too bad Mills can't take claim either. It is
an open issue.
If Don Hotson is partially correct in his interpretation of Dirac
(but not completely) then the epo-BEC, which is the "aether" may
have a number of temporal or spatial realties that are "not-quite"
fully condensed - for varying lengths of time, or in certain
environments ...?
Jones
