Terry,

> If your hypothesis is correct, should not burning my grandmother's old
rain barrel generate more heat than burning another equivalent mass of wood?

Keen observation. However, if hydrinohydrides diffused out of rainwater and accumulates in wood preferentially (as opposed to them diffusing even further into ground over time), burning them in a normal fire would likely NOT release any extra energy. The solar variety would simply be too stable and would sruvive any fire intact.

Once again, I am playing devil's advocate here, because there is no convincing evidence for any of this - only persistent anecdote and changing-hypotheses.

The two electrons of this species are said by Mills to be very tightly bound at this level of shrinkage, in the keV range. Otherwise they would have already been "reinflated" in the solar corona (most are probably reinflated anyway, immediately after formation, and only the maximum entalpy variety gets this far).

Their best use for "overunity" on earth, is if they can be captured immediately and enriched, and even then it would seem to hinge on being able to use them 'destructively' as capacitance without the need to reinflate or shrink further- i.e. to use them to retain less tightly bound charge temporarily -and then to anihilate that charge explosively in a situation, like in an ICE where the explosion can push a piston.

Waterfuel likely does not really involve 'water' at all as an active modality- except for its property of very high dielectric constant and easy ionization. Water is most likely only a fuel in the sense of being involved in a mechanical failure such as exploding capacitance... but - only with hydrinos involved, as well as transitory peroxides, hydroxyl hydrates, hydronium and all of the other charged species which can be held in a temporal structure by the presence of a stable charge carrier (hydrinohydride) juxtaposed to a strong dielelctric material (water).

There are other convincing views on this - including the possibility that - being small and dense, the Hy- would catalyze LENR, or would shrink even further.

In terms of actual probability, my feeling is that the induced secondary *capacitance* in water, based on the reality of solar-derived hydrinos, is the only way to explain adequately what has been seen and reported in the large amount of recent anecdote relating to waterfuel.

I find it interesting that Graneau, in a totally unrelated experiment, only gets good results using rainwater. Perhaps he is seeing a glimmer of the same effect in a brute force discharge, when he would be better off with a pretreated rainwater regime. That one is on my 'to-do' list also.

Jones


Reply via email to