Terry,
> If your hypothesis is correct, should not burning my
grandmother's old
rain barrel generate more heat than burning another equivalent
mass of wood?
Keen observation. However, if hydrinohydrides diffused out of
rainwater and accumulates in wood preferentially (as opposed to
them diffusing even further into ground over time), burning them
in a normal fire would likely NOT release any extra energy. The
solar variety would simply be too stable and would sruvive any
fire intact.
Once again, I am playing devil's advocate here, because there is
no convincing evidence for any of this - only persistent anecdote
and changing-hypotheses.
The two electrons of this species are said by Mills to be very
tightly bound at this level of shrinkage, in the keV range.
Otherwise they would have already been "reinflated" in the solar
corona (most are probably reinflated anyway, immediately after
formation, and only the maximum entalpy variety gets this far).
Their best use for "overunity" on earth, is if they can be
captured immediately and enriched, and even then it would seem to
hinge on being able to use them 'destructively' as capacitance
without the need to reinflate or shrink further- i.e. to use them
to retain less tightly bound charge temporarily -and then to
anihilate that charge explosively in a situation, like in an ICE
where the explosion can push a piston.
Waterfuel likely does not really involve 'water' at all as an
active modality- except for its property of very high dielectric
constant and easy ionization. Water is most likely only a fuel in
the sense of being involved in a mechanical failure such as
exploding capacitance... but - only with hydrinos involved, as
well as transitory peroxides, hydroxyl hydrates, hydronium and all
of the other charged species which can be held in a temporal
structure by the presence of a stable charge carrier
(hydrinohydride) juxtaposed to a strong dielelctric material
(water).
There are other convincing views on this - including the
possibility that - being small and dense, the Hy- would catalyze
LENR, or would shrink even further.
In terms of actual probability, my feeling is that the induced
secondary *capacitance* in water, based on the reality of
solar-derived hydrinos, is the only way to explain adequately what
has been seen and reported in the large amount of recent anecdote
relating to waterfuel.
I find it interesting that Graneau, in a totally unrelated
experiment, only gets good results using rainwater. Perhaps he is
seeing a glimmer of the same effect in a brute force discharge,
when he would be better off with a pretreated rainwater regime.
That one is on my 'to-do' list also.
Jones
- [Vo]: Re: Priceless ! Jones Beene
-