|
This NY Times article today talks about the rush to
create ethanol from corn in the heartland of America and how it is regenerating
small town agriculture. It mentions that the "energy balance" of ethanol
as a fuel versus the energy from fertiliser, tractor diesel etc used
in producing it, is dubious to say the least. While there is plenty to annoy
environmentalists, economists etc in this article what particularly annoyed me
was this near the beginning...
<<Once
considered the green dream of the environmentally sensitive, ethanol has become
the province of agricultural giants that have long pressed for its use as fuel,
as well as newcomers seeking to cash in on a bonanza>>
Biofuel, in the way they are talking about, was
NEVER the "green dream of the environmentally sensitive". Right from when it was
first thought about it was realised that conventionally growing crops, such
as corn, as biomass would have problems with the energy balance, top
soil impoverishment etc. On the other hand,
growing one's own tractor fuel on an integrated organic farm can work
sustainably but absolutely cannot be scaled up to grow the amount of fuel
that the pork barrel politicians are suggesting - it would create a new dust
bowl.
Nick
|
- [Vo]: OT : ethanol biofuel and stupid white men Nick Palmer
- Re: [Vo]: OT : ethanol biofuel and stupid white men Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]: OT : ethanol biofuel and stupid white men Jed Rothwell

