Can't figure why some try to wing it and omit the link
that tells you something drawn from the major league genius of
the 19th and 20th centuries..

http://www2.ijs.si/~kkocevar/skripta.pdf 

3.1 Interactions between molecules
3.1.1 Coulomb interactions: Born solvation energy of an ion
>Equations in here<
"The Born energy of ions in water is usually quite large. For example: The
change of
free energy by transferring 1 mole of anions and cations from vacuum to
water is (assuming
a = 0.14 nm) is -1000 kJmol-1."

Concievably the"Bubble" could be the void space surrounding the hydrated
ions.
Any reason that these pulled from the Joe Cell can't dump megajoules of
energy in the ICE cylinder?

Fred

> [Original Message]
> From: Grimer 
>
> At 08:40 am 13/07/2006 -0700, Jones wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Frederick Sparber
> >
> >
> > A fundamental law?
> > Energy is inversely proportional to radius?
> >
> >
> > Certainly true regarding photon wavelength
> >
> > - plus - Prof. Casimir sez: as you go smaller
> > and smaller in dimensions, then the increase
> > turns from cubic to fourth-power,
> > therefore ... one might suppose - that this
> > threshold of about 100 nm is (hypothetically)
> > the real advantage of a nanobubble over a
> > microbubble ?
> >
> > Jones
> >
> > The sequence of fourth powers of integers goes:
> > 1, 16, 81, 256, 625, 1296, 2401, 4096, 6561, 10000,
>
>
>
>
> That would be true for the solid vapour drop between
> 100° and the critical temperature but because vapour
> is a spherical shell between 0° and 100° I believe
> it should be an eighth power.
>
> The sequence for eighth powers of integers one to ten goes:
> 1 - 256 - 6,561 - 65,536 - 390,625 - .......... 100,000,000
>
> which means its potential energy would increase by a factor
> of 100 million. 8-)
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Since I wrote the above (which got bounced) I see that Fred
> is up to a sixth and seventh power - but let's not make an
> issue of it. The essential thing is that it is the
> equivalent of the adiabatic branches in the Alpha-
> atmosphere Carnot cycle. One might say that the "power"
> compression is the.....
>
> =================================================
> et aliud cecidit in terram bonam et dabat fructum
> ascendentem et crescentem et adferebat unum
> triginta et unum sexaginta et unum centum
> =================================================
>
> I now realise that Jones is the one who has really got
> the tiger by the tail in his recognition that as the
> scale decreases we meet with a discontinuity in behavior.
>
> Let's call it the Casimir phase boundary -
> or better still the Caspar boundary. <g>
>
> I must confess that in the discussion on the Yahoo site
> I was still thinking in terms of the working fluid inside
> the bubble being a gas - Jones was racing ahead and I
> hadn't managed to catch up.
>
> But I now see that the enormous change is scale means that
> we have crossed the boundary from a gas to a plasma of some
> kind. We have crossed a change in state boundary and the
> working fluid of the quasi-Carnot cycle is a Beta-atmosphere
> gas. Let's assume it is an exciton gas for now.
>
> As I have pointed out elsewhere one can go round the A-atm.
> Carnot cycle either by changing the space variable [switching
> insulation] or by changing the time variable [slow compression-
> expansion equals isothermal.....fast compression-expansion
> equals adiabatic].
>
> Now assuming that the "conditioning" of the water that the
> enthusiasts seem to go on about has a real effect, it's not
> difficult to recognise what this represents in terms of a
> Beta-atmosphere exciton gas quasi-Carnot cycle.
>
> Conditioning has to be the equivalent of the slow isothermal
> arms of the Alpha-atmosphere Carnot.
>
> Have I caught up yet, Jones. 8-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Frank
>
> =====================================
> [Caspar]
> Frankincense to offer have I,
> incense owns a Deity nigh
> Prayer and praising, all men raising,
> Worship Him, God most high.
> =====================================
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to