In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:38:29 -0700: Hi, Actually, considering that tungsten forms the anode of many x-ray machines, I was rather surprised to see a claim of any neutrons at all. Surely if neutrons were produced under these conditions, they would show up in x-ray machines, and would be acknowledged as a common occurrence? Or do these neutrons only show up when hydrogen is present, concurrently with a strong magnetic field?
...or perhaps Horvath is confusing little Hydrinos with neutrons? >Robin > >> The creation of this high flux of photons is >> associated with release of large numbers of neutrons within the >> tungsten target.... > >... what is a "large numbers of neutrons"? Rather subjective, no? > >At the same voltage, a Farnsworth Fusor can produce about a >hundred thousand neutrons per second. That sounds "large", but it >is at least five orders of magnitude below breakeven. > >Given that the Fusor results are rock solid, going back thirty >years, those numbers can be used as an objective basis for >determining "how large is large" ... so the statement could be >true, if the acutal numbers are in the same range as the Fusor, >yet still be not even close to breakeven - if that was an intended >implication. Half-full or half-empty? > >Jones > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/ Competition provides the motivation, Cooperation provides the means.
