> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 7/31/2006 2:41:44 AM
> Subject: RE: [Vo]: Re: Aqueous-Electrolytic  CO2 Catalyzed H2 Production
>
>
> > Fred wrote:
> >
> > US 5,928,806 suggests to me that a pipe inside a pipe
> > insulated
> > with an insulating reducing bushing (inside a coupling at
> > the top)
> > filled with water and pressurized with CO2 should produce a
> > variety of
> > combustible organics
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> I didn't actively pursue this at the time as (1) I had no ready source of
CO2 (thought about tests using a 'soda stream', though!) and (2) I was
concerned about efficiencies.  The latter was really why I posed the
question to the Y! VS group - as far as I remember, Viktor's process
involved very similar chemistry (under pressure), but no electrical power
(although some human power was required for 'stirring' with a dual metal
paddle).  Sadly, the VS group was happier talking about about 'vortex'
water filter jugs etc. than this sort of thing...
>
Attention Deficit Disorder is a common malady on vortex too, Patrick.  :-)

Reacting wood (or other) biomass ashes and apple cider vinegar makes for an
environmentally friendly 
high pressure CO2 source, Patrick. 

Got to keep Nick Palmer calmer.  :-)
>
> I'll try to fish out the original information - it would be interesting
to see your take on the VS (unpowered) chemistry.
>
Please do. Thanks.

Fred
>
> Cheers,
> Patrick



Reply via email to