MC: I'm reluctant to get involved in this area again, but some things need persepctive. I have seen the text of, but not studied, the new Correa patent. -------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: Christopher Arnold
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Correa Patent Issued


Terry,

Igor Alexeff invented the Plasma Discharge Tube that the Correas Borrowed and say they discovered it. please see this for yourself http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%%2FPTO%%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F4291255

MC: I looked at the claims and description of the Alexeff device on the referenced link. There is no resemblance to the Correa PAGD, which is apparent if one studies the PAGD patentes, which I have done. Their thread of discovery as descrtibed to me by Paulo is utterly different from Alexeff.

The Correas use of my Pulsed Plasma Drive to power their motor is the infringement.

MC: The original PAGD patents and claims include driving a motor, which is also illustrated in a early video shown at a conference decades ago,

The Pulsed Plasma Drive can never directly produce an abnormal glow discharge which is known of as a weak plasma, compared to the Dense Plasma Focus of my Pulsed Plasma Drive - which is an extremely powerful and energetic Plasma, capable of of D+D, D+T and even aneutronic fusion as I told Puthoff in 2000.

MC: And Arnold is now making a clear distinction between his device and PAGD? The PAGD discharge releases much more energy than it takes to maintain the conditions for the effect to occur.

If the Correa's PAGD Tube is so marvelous, why didn't it impress Eugene Mallove, considering Mallove flatly told me he did "not" believe my Spark Gap Drive (Pulsed Plasma Drive) would work at all. Jim from Sarasota attempted to get an interview with me published by Mallove, who still thought Dense Plasma Focus would never allow atomic Fusion - but it was all too much for Mallove to understand or believe.

MC: Arnold is quite confused here. Mallove *was* impressed by PAGD, which as Arnold says is clearly different from his Dense Plasma Focus device.

The Correa's new patent was applied after I first contacted them to explain how my device was different from the PADG tube, and did not even require containment or working gasses - which they did not believe. You can clearly see they believe me now.

As for their work with Orgone boxes - please remember it is from the published works of Wilhelm Reich and the Correas only duplicated it, they did NOT discover anything new in that case, or in the case of my Plasma Drive. And yes - I believe that Reich's Orgone box works - but he had many other more obscure contraptions that worked just as well. Reich never mentioned using either AC or DC Electrical Pulses in his devices - and the Orgone device was not my machine, but a contraption that was based on Reich's Orgone theories (not electrical) - and quite strange looking when I first viewed it.

MC: To my incomplete knowledge, the Correas are quite familiar with Reich's work. Their orgone box demonstrated a heat differential that was able to drive a simple Stirling engine.

By the Correa's suggesting that Reich's works were connected in any way to using electrical driving power - they show themselves to have ZERO comprehension of Reich's true work or the energy involved.

As I said, the Correa's are common folk.

As for them using a Ouija board, dice or tarot cards for scientific insight - that is more likely than not.

MC: This slam is utterly unjustified by volume of careful work represented in the Correa patents. I found the Correas quite sophisticated.

Mike Carrell

Reply via email to