Jones, how about this 1999 patent?.
They use Glow Discharge and UV (together) and claim H2O2 production
increases from ~ 12% to ~ 25% .
http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?KEY=99/37581.991028
Title:
(WO/1999/037581) HIGH EFFICIENCY GLOW DISCHARGE GASEOUS PROCESSING SYSTEM
FOR HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PRODUCTION AND OTHER CHEMICAL PROCESSING OF GASES.
Abstract:
A high efficiency plasma processing system for use in the generation of
large quantities of gases, particularly hydrogen peroxide or ozone, for
chemical commercial and industrial applications is based upon a homogeneous
electrical glow discharge. In addition to the homogenous discharge, the high
efficiency of ozone or other chemical production is achieved by exciting the
discharge with high voltage pulses which have a voltage rate-of-rise in
excess of 500 V/ns and incorporating an internal gas circulation system
which maintains the temperature of the process gas to a level where the
thermal decomposition of ozone, for example, is significantly reduced. A
homogeneous and stable atmospheric glow discharge is developed by
preionizing the discharge region with ultra-violet radiation, for example,
immediately before the application of the main high voltage pulse across the
electrodes of the discharge cell.
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:30 PM
Subject: [Vo]: Re: What is HTP ?
Fred is a "gold mine" of information these days...
The larger question for consideration of MTP (medium test peroxide, ~ 35%)
as an alternative fuel is: what is the lowest possible "energy cost" for
producing HOOH from ozone?
Fred provided this reference:
"The theoretical yield is 1200 grams O3 per kilowatt-Hour,
commercial units show 5%efficiency in air and 15% in O2".
<snip>
