I read about this effect and I don't understand it's relationship to supposed free energy. I've read stuff by Aspden about it and I don't comprehend why he sees this effect as having a bearing on free energy generation.
On the other hand, I think he has some good points about "ether". If empty space has permittivity and offers radiation resistance, how can it be "nothing" or not involve some sort of medium? If we keep giving properties to the "vacuum", when do we return to it to being "ether"? If it walks and quacks like a duck, is it a duck? -----Original Message----- From: Colin Quinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:03 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Aspden Effect Vorts ! I am looking for an article... :) The Aspden Effect was first mentioned in an item that was published in the February 1995 issue of NEN (New Energy News). Vol 2, #10. pages 1, 2,... I have tried to order a back-copy . . . without success. The "effect" is anomalous angular momentum, some kind of virtual inertia- reported therein by Harold Aspden, and later described here: http://www.energyscience.org.uk/le/Le30/le30.html * ORIGINAL PAPER : http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE8E.html CONTENTS FOR FEBRUARY 1995: Vol. 2, No. 10 DISCOVERY OF "VIRTUAL INERTIA" ................1 THE ASPDEN EFFECT .............................2 If anyone had a subscription at that time, may I please prevail upon you to obtain a copy? Thanks very much :) Best Regards, Colin Quinney crquin at rogers.com
